NAZIs, Fascists, Socialists, Communists, and Capitalists, oh my!

Our headlines today are filled with pundits, commentators, influencers, and countless individuals accusing folks on the "other" side of being <fill in the blank with one or more of the following> {NAZIs, Fascists, Communists, etc.}. 

Often these terms are used so interchangeably, however, they are not truly interchangeable. Each is these -ists and -isms have distinct, although often overlapping, meanings. 

I have always felt that when you want to throw a label at someone else, if you don't really know what it means, then it shows the accuser's ignorance more than it reveals about the accused. So, let's jump into this.

NAZI

NAZI is an acronym. Translated from the original German it means National Socialist German Workers' Party or in German "Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterparte" (Gunner, 2021). The term NAZI and fascist are often used interchangeably. This is because the NAZI party was both socialist and fascist, as well as nationalist. 

Socialist

Socialism is commonly used interchangeably with communism. According to ThoughtCo, "The main difference is that under communism, most property and economic resources are owned and controlled by the state (rather than individual citizens); under socialism, all citizens share equally in economic resources as allocated by a democratically-elected government." (Longley, 2024). In both of these -isms, the government is authoritarian and controlling everything. The primary distinction is the socialists let people "own" private property, but they still must use it only as the state dictates, and the state can revoke ownership at anytime. To me, this seems to be a mere pretense of private property ownership. 

The ThoughtCo article cited above (Longley, 2024) notes that socialism includes the notion that people receive according to their contribution, rather than simply according to their need. In that regard, socialism is less altruistic in its implementation.

Communist

In contrast, communism doesn't pretend that individuals own anything. Everything is owned by the state and administered by the oligarchs and the bureaucracy according to what they believe is in the best interests of the people, without regard to the opinions, feelings, or actual needs of those same people.

For me, socialism and communism are, in their effects, identical and interchangeable. Although, for years I have labored under the notion that communism was expressly aimed at forcibly imposing these principles on the entire in an egalitarian manner, not favoring one nation or ethnicity over another. Socialism, I was taught, was a bit more nationalistic in scope, which is consistent with the notions of Aryan supremacy that seems inextricably linked with Nazism. 

Fascist

Fascism is an authoritarian approach to governing which, although it allows personal property, the government maintains a shallow form of capitalism. They coopt businesses (personally owned enterprises) into arms of the government to carry out the regulations and laws. 

Although fascist parties and movements differed significantly from one another, they had many characteristics in common, including extreme militaristic nationalism, contempt for electoral democracy and political and cultural liberalism, a belief in natural social hierarchy and the rule of elites, and the desire to create a Volksgemeinschaft (German: “people’s community”), in which individual interests would be subordinated to the good of the nation. (Soucy, 2024)

Pulling from the citation above allows me to create a list of attributes of fascism:

• Militaristic, 
• nationalistic, 
• contempt for democracy, 
• contempt for political liberalism, 
• contempt for cultural liberalism, 
• rule of the elites, 
• individual interest subordinated to the good of the nation 

To better understand this list requires some further elaboration and definition of these terms.

• Militarism - meaning a tendency to resort to organized violence using military and paramilitary groups to intimidate or eliminate opposition.
• Nationalism - the notion of one nation being superior to another. However, it is worth noting that the proponents of the United Nations and "one world government" are merely a different flavor of nationalism rather than being anti-nationalist.
• Contempt for democracy - Setting aside the distinctions nuances democracy, constitutionalism, and republicanism, and representative democracy leaves us with the term democracy as shorthand for respect for the sovereignty of individuals, and their deliberate acceptance of a social compact as the source of legitimate government. Contempt for democracy translates into contempt for the inalienable rights of individuals to govern themselves.
• Contempt for liberalism (political and cultural) - in this context, Britannica goes on to define liberalism as "protecting and enhancing the freedom of the individual." (Minogue, 2024). Note that today's so-called "liberals" are markedly at odds with support for the freedom (AKA self-sovereignty) of the individual.
• Elitism - the rule of elites being the preferred approach of fascists of all stripes. Elites may qualify for this 'designation' either through their academic achievements, excessive wealth, political power, or celebrity. 
• Subordination of individual well-being to the "good of the nation" - Doing horrific things to individuals and minorities in the interest of promoting "the greater good," was the driving force behind Hitler's genocide against the Jews and has been used by tyrants, oligarchs, and conspirators to justify terrible crimes throughout history.

Capitalist

Unlike Socialism and Communism which combine both economic and political motives and means, capitalism is purely an economic philosophy. Capitalism is non-political in its definition. However, it does rely upon certain strongly political points.

Capitalism is fundamentally based on property rights and individual sovereignty. Drawing on Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations concludes that capitalism is about two parties making an exchange of goods, services, or both, absent any coercion.  It is this point of coercion that brings capitalism into conflict  in various degrees by communism, socialism, and fascism.

To be totally candid, the issue of coercion brings capitalism into conflict with all political regimens beyond the realm of self-governance. This is the primary point made by "card-carrying" libertarians.

Conclusion

I believe that most people bandy around these terms, hurling them at those who disagree with them, with little understanding or regard for the actual definitions of these terms. I hope that folks will take a moment and consider what each of these terms means. Then compare the meanings against the actions and words of those they want to paint with these labels. If the "shoe fits," then by all means use it. But please, stop hurling these -ists and -isms without knowing what you are talking about.

References

Gunner, Jennifer. (9 September 2021). Nazi: Meaning and Origin of the Word. Retrieved from:  https://www.yourdictionary.com/articles/abbreviations-nazi-meaning-origin 

Longley, Robert. (5 May 2024). The Differences Between Socialism and Communism. Retrieved from: https://www.thoughtco.com/difference-between-communism-and-socialism-195448 

Soucy, Robert. (21 October 2024). Fascism. Britannica, retrieved from: https://www.britannica.com/topic/fascism 

Minogue, Kenneth; Girvetz, Harry K. (5 September 2024). Liberalism. Britannica. Retrieved from: https://www.britannica.com/topic/liberalism 

See Tom's political views on Facebook at: https://www.facebook.com/TomSheppardPoliticalViews/
Follow Tom on Twitter: @ThomasKSheppard

Tom Sheppard is a business consultant and coach to small business owners and individuals. He is a recognized author with dozens of titles in business and fiction to his credit. One of his endeavors is to help those who want to see their own book in print. He does this through his trademarked Book Whispering Process (TM).

The author is not an official spokesperson for any organization or person mentioned herein.

(c) Copyright 2020 A+ Results LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Your comments are welcome... Please observe some ground rules. No profanity, vulgarity, or personal attacks. Profanity, vulgarity and personal attacks not only betray a lack of vocabulary and imagination, they also are the hallmarks of bigotry, and bigotry is the hallmark of someone who is fundamentally insecure in their views. Facts are always welcome.

If you believe Government is NOT the answer to all our problems, you will want to read
 Godvernment: Government as God

Freedom of Speech: Disinformation versus Misinformation

The First Amendment to the US Constitution as found in the Bill of Rights

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

The first amendment to the US Constitution provides several guarantees:

1. No governmental interference with the exercise of religion
2. No governmental interference with the freedom of speech
3. No governmental interference with the freedom of the press
4. No governmental interference with the ability of the people to assemble
5. No governmental interference with the ability of the people to petition the government

Free Speech

While discussion of free speech is nothing new to our national discourse it has become a very hot topic lately. A particular flashpoint has been debates over whether or not people should be able to freely disseminate disinformation and misinformation.

Rather than giving space here to discuss the merits of free speech (I am a fan), I want to make sure we are all aware of the meaning of the words we are using, so that when we talk about misinformation and disinformation, we start from a common understanding.

Lies

The words disinformation and misinformation both mean the same thing: lies. The only difference between the two is that disinformation carries the added weight that the purveyor knows the truth and is deliberately spreading lies. Misinformation, in contrast may be an honest mistake; telling a lie without knowing it is a lie.

Opinions

My problem with the current debate on free speech is that too many people conflate opposing opinions with deliberate lies. For anyone to lie requires that there are immutable facts at the core of the debate. Unfortunately, the current state of so-called journalism is very long on opinion and very short on facts.

Facts

It is the absence of facts that compels police to refer to a suspect as an "alleged" perpetrator until after the person is convicted in a court of law. That is because a big part of the function of a trial is to establish what are the facts in a situation, in contrast with the opinions, perspectives, and views of anyone.

Poor Journalism

All too often what a journalist calls disinformation is actually an opinion that differs from that of the journalist. It is hard to figure this out because the talking heads on TV and the poison pen opinion pieces that many journalist pass off as news contain relatively few actual facts compared to the abundance of opinion and hyperbole.

It seems to me that most so-called journalists today are afraid to just report the news. They seem to fear that their audience is too stupid (or too smart) to hear the facts and draw conclusions that align with those of the reporter.

Critical Thinking

The current pervasiveness of this sort of nineteenth century yellow-journalism (or journalistic advocacy, if you prefer a less harsh term for the corruption of our 'news' media) seems to be to be an indictment of both the profession of journalism and of the efficacy of our educational system to produce citizens who can look at facts and draw their own conclusions through critical thinking.

Just the Facts

For my part, I long for news sources that report the facts, all the facts that are available. I long for journalistic integrity that will report both the flattering facts and the unflattering facts, and let me decide my own opinion, rather than trying to force feed me theirs. I am equally put off by Sean Hannity tailoring a story to promote Donald Trump as I am by Jen Psaki tailoring a story to promote Kamala Harris. Neither are offering news. Both are offering opinion pieces. At least Fox positions Hannity is positioned as an opinion show. MSNBC's Jen Psaki overtly presents news and then seamlessly shifts to opinion. Of course, given than Jen Psaki was the spokesperson for a Democrat President of the United States, it shouldn't surprise anyone that she isn't taking a neutral stance and just reporting facts.

Looking for Good News

If you have found a news bureau that truly reports the facts, without pruning them to create a particular spin, please, let me know.

And, if you can disagree without being disagreeable, let's start our own club. I am always open to hearing other viewpoints. I just don't appreciate it when facts are either ignored or made up.

See Tom's political views on Facebook at: https://www.facebook.com/TomSheppardPoliticalViews/
Follow Tom on Twitter: @ThomasKSheppard

Tom Sheppard is a business consultant and coach to small business owners and individuals. He is a recognized author with dozens of titles in business and fiction to his credit. One of his endeavors is to help those who want to see their own book in print. He does this through his trademarked Book Whispering Process (TM).

The author is not an official spokesperson for any organization or person mentioned herein.

(c) Copyright 2024 A+ Results LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Your comments are welcome... Please observe some ground rules. No profanity, vulgarity, or personal attacks. Profanity, vulgarity and personal attacks not only betray a lack of vocabulary and imagination, they also are the hallmarks of bigotry, and bigotry is the hallmark of someone who is fundamentally insecure in their views. Facts are always welcome.

If you believe Government is NOT the answer to all our problems, you will want to read
 Godvernment: Government as God

Eating Right Makes Me Fit for the Destination

Fasting and Eating

This is the first Sunday of the Month of March. Every month, usually on the first Sunday of the month, members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints celebrate a period of fasting. Those who can,  abstain from food and drink for two consecutive meals. They donate the value of those meals to be used to directly help the needy in their area. They typically refer to this day as "Fast Sunday."

Because today is Fast Sunday, I am thinking about food, and what we eat. What I eat. Or what I should eat (more on that later).

Fit or Fat

With the advancement of medical sciences we have gained a lot of insights into how diet affects our health. We know that too much food, in excess of what we need to fuel ourselves for the day, tends to make us fat. We know that some foods, regardless of the quantity or our caloric needs then to make us fat. We also know that being fat, carrying excess weight, tends to produce some very bad health outcomes, most of which culminate in suffering and death at an earlier age than might otherwise be the case. The medical studies citing the role of excess weight in heart disease, strokes, joint failure, liver failure, and other issues are too numerous to cite, or refute.

The "get skinny" and the "get fit" industries (the two overlap but are not the same) capitalize on these facts to promote a variety of products and processes. Most of those products and processes have dubious benefits and some are more harmful to our health than being fat.

Junk Food

All this is a roundabout way to make the point that if I feed myself a steady diet of junk food, I can only expect to suffer weakness, ill health, and untimely death. In contrast, if I eat a reasonably healthy diet, ensure I have at least some moderate regular exercise (walking is exercise), I can expect to enjoy physical strength, mental acuity, and moderately good health until my body wears out, or I exit mortality from some abrupt misfortune. Of course, fat or fit, I have no guarantee that some ailment or accident won't somehow wreck me.

Now that I am thinking about the effects of my diet on my physical body, I'm going to s switch gears and consider the diet and exercise I am feeding my spirit.

Natural Diets

For all the advancements of medical and physical sciences none of the sciences can identify what animates a living being and is then absent from the deceased. They can measure and track the evidences of animation, and they can even note many things which directly result in the cessation of animation. However, they are unable to see, even with the most powerful of microscopes or other medical imaging devices, the source of what animates our minds and bodies. Natural sciences can only reveal nature.

Spiritual Diets

To gain insight into the world which science is unable to penetrate requires reliance on sources that are outside of nature. The supernatural. God is, by definition, a supernatural being. He does not appear to be bound by the same laws of nature which we observe. Fortunately for us, He has deliberately revealed himself to humanity on many occasions throughout time. Although it is not my purpose here to delve into those occasions, it is relevant to note that He has repeatedly revealed some key facts which we could not discover on our own:

1. He exists
2. He is more powerful and wise than we can imagine
3. He cares about us
4. Each of us has both a spirit and a body

He has revealed a lot more than this, but these are the relevant points for this essay.

What animates our minds and bodies is our spirit. 

Spiritual Junk Food

My question today is, what happens if our spirit has the same kind of diet and exercise routine as we give our bodies? And what does a good, or bad, spiritual diet and exercise routine look like?

I believe that if I feed my spirit a steady diet of spiritual junk food and give it very little spiritual exercise, it makes my spirit weak and sickly. It may even bring me to a form of spiritual death, perhaps before I am ready to leave mortality.

On the other hand, if I feed my spirit healthy spiritual diet and at least moderate spiritual exercise I will enjoy a more robust physical and spiritual life. This leads to some important questions:

1. What is a good spiritual diet or a bad spiritual diet? 
2. How can I know the difference between them?

Seeing Good and Bad

I am going to start with the last question. How can I know the difference between things that are good for my spirit and those that are bad for my spirit?

The answer is simpler, and harder, than people may imagine. It is encompassed in the teaching that "by [its] fruits you will know [it]"

Good Fruits

In my experience, a good spiritual regimen has the following effects or fruits:

• I have more energy
• Gratitude - My appreciation and enjoyment of the good things in your life is enhanced, making the bad things in my life more tolerable.
• Patience / Tolerance - I feel more peaceful because I know that getting things wrong is a necessary part of growing and learning, both for me and others. I am inclined to kindness toward others who may not be able to anything for me. I am more patient with stupid people, selfish people, and mean people because I understand that I have my own flaws, which may not be the same as theirs and we are all trying to get through this life wearing a spiritual blindfold most of the time.
• Optimism - While a good spiritual regimen doesn't give me an unrealistic outlook on the world, it makes me a more optimistic person. If God is real, and He cares about me, then, although I may not see what he does or understand it, I can trust that He is working for my well-being. And, if I have God in my corner rooting for me, how can I not get back on my feet when I have been knocked down and push forward when everything else seems to be trying to hold me back and drag me down?
• Attractive - It attracts people who want or who have a good spiritual regimen. It is a natural fact that "birds of a feather flock together."

Bad Fruits

In my experience a bad spiritual regimen has the following fruit (and yes, I do have experience with bad spiritual regimens of myself and others):

• Depression - a lack of energy
• Pessimism - the expectation and outlook that good things don't stay in my life
• Anxiety - the constant fear of getting it wrong and bringing extra pain and embarrassment into my life.
• Impatience / Perfectionism - Life is too short to get anything wrong and others are constantly stealing my most precious and unrenewable resource in this life, my time. If they can't help me to get what I want, then they need to get out of the way and stop slowing me down. Also, I hate it when I get in my own way by not doing something perfectly and getting the exact outcome I desired.
• Self-Righteousness / Intolerance - Anyone who doesn't see the world the way I do lacks the intelligence to be worthy of life and liberty or my time and attention. They will just waste their own and steal my time. Their biggest sin is their stupidity in not sharing my opinion.
• Ingratitude - What I have is never enough. There is always more out there that I don't have in my grasp.
• Envy and Covetousness - The worst part of life is that I can see that others, who aren't as deserving as me, have more and better in their life than I. I cannot celebrate their success, I can only mourn that theirs isn't mine.
• Repulsive - Ironically, although like attracts like, no one truly enjoys the company of consistently negative or toxic people. Although I may accrue some power and followers, and some may love me despite myself, no one will enjoy being around me for long.

So, look at the fruits above. Which list resonates more? Those fruits are the effects of a bad spiritual diet and exercise regimen.

The Good Food Diet

This leads me to the first question: What is a good spiritual diet or a bad spiritual diet? 

I know, that is really two questions, but I will deal with them as one. They are one because the bad spiritual regimen is most often the absence of a good spiritual regimen. My spiritual regimen, good and bad, is what I do everyday, even if I am unaware of it.

I am naturally more aware of my physical diet and exercise because it is right there front of my eyes. My spirit is unseen and I am often blithely unaware of my spiritual diet and exercise. Unlike my body which promptly gets my attention when I neglect it, the neglect of my spirit doesn't make me visibly collapse and put me in the hospital because I abused it.

Confessions and Disclaimers

So, what is a good spiritual regimen (diet and exercise)? Before sharing this I must confess to whomever reads this two things:

1. I do not perfectly practice a good spiritual regimen. I am not perfect. I have my flaws, some of which I enjoy and shouldn't. I am trying to want to be the person I should be.
2. I am an unapologetic believer in Jesus of Nazareth as the Christ and the Only Begotten Son of God. I believe that Jesus was telling the truth when he said, "I am the way, the truth, and the light." He said "the" not "a" way. I also believe that the truths that lead us to Him are seeded in all the religions of the world. Because of that, regardless of your religious affiliation, a good spiritual regimen will bear good fruits for you.

Good Eating

Here are the parts of a good spiritual regimen, as I and many others have experienced them:

• Wake up to what I am "eating." 
• A diet of emotionally, sexually, and mentally numbing movies, video games, music, reading, and other entertainment is the spiritual equivalent of junk food.
• In a physical diet, exercising the "table muscle" of pushing yourself away from the table before I feel full is an important part of not overeating. Likewise in my spiritual diet, I exercise my table muscle and push back from the junk food buffet being pushed at me by media and society. Instead of mindlessly eating what is being served up, I try to push back from the table. I take a look at what is available, and replace junk food with healthy food.
• Deliberately start putting good things into my spiritual diet.
• Try to make time each day to read (or listen to) the scriptures. Whether the scriptures of my religion are called the Quran, Bible, Torah, Shastras, Mahayana, or the myths of my ancestors, I need to make time each week (or daily at best) to read them.
• While I am reading and listening, I think about how it might apply  to my life and to my challenges and I write down or record my thoughts and impressions.
• I have made (or borrowed) a list of the books which have been around for decades or centuries as  examples of great literature and important reading. I pick one. I read it. I write down, or record, my thoughts as I read it and after I am done reading it. 
• Make time to think about what I am reading and listening to. I think about how it might apply  to my life and to my challenges.
• Then, I pick another book from the list and do it again. If I finish all the books on my list, I make another list and do it all again.
• Wake up to what I am thinking.
• Thinking is the spiritual equivalent of chewing. When I chew my food, I break it up into smaller pieces and taste it with my mouth. When I think, I am tasting with my  imagination, my mind, and my spirit. 
• Are my idle thoughts filled with bitterness, revenge, self-indulgence, or self-pity? Or are they filled imaginings of me acting like the kind of person I want to become?
• Your thoughts will become your words. Your words will turn into your deeds. Your deeds will make your destiny.
• I want to be the hero of my story, not the victim, and certainly not the villain.
• Take more control of my thoughts.
• Meditate. I periodically make time to be still. Silence the noise and activity around me. I clear my mind for a time, focusing on slow and steady breathing and releasing the tensions in my body. 
• Build inner self-awareness.
• I have tried to learn what are my "buttons" that others use to manipulate and control me. I pick up one thought, word, or action of my own in my life, recent or long past. Something I have thought, said, or done. I decide if is it something I am proud of and pleased about, or uncomfortable with. I seek to understand what seemed to compel  me to think, say, or do that. Was that the only course I could have taken in that situation? I examine if my thought, word, or deed was the result of me letting something (or someone) control and compel me, a reaction? Or, was it a deliberate choice I made after quickly considering the alternatives and choosing the one that would likely have the outcome I desire most.  
• Decide what kind of person I want to be.
• I strive to learn lessons from my past. If I could relive a moment, would I make the same choice? If not, then I decide how I want to handle any similar situation that may occur in my future. I imagine myself making the clear choice and imagine the probable outcomes of that choice. Do I like those outcomes? If not, then I do it again in my mind and make different choices.

Conclusions

Making conscious choices for ourselves is the most important part of maturity. Choosing the kind of person I want to become is the single most important choice I can make in my life. Everything else, every other choice is more chance than choice until I make that big choice. 

I am convinced that choosing the kind of person I want to become, for it to be worth the prices I pay, must be made for myself. To please me. It is foolish for me to choose what to become to please my spouse, children, parents, friends, or even God. Although all of those may have my best interests at heart, if I don't choose because that is what we want, I will never be happy or content either in my journey or my destiny / destination.

For my part, I want to want to be like God. I struggle because there are moments when I want to do things that aren't at all godly. Every time I fail and fall down, I can hear God in my corner urging me on saying, "It's not over and you're not finished. Consider the lesson you just learned. Make it a part of you. Get back up on your feet. Face forward and press on. It's the journey that will make you fit for the destination I have prepared for you."

See Tom's political views on Facebook at: https://www.facebook.com/TomSheppardPoliticalViews/
Follow Tom on X: @ThomasKSheppard

Tom Sheppard is a business consultant and coach to small business owners and individuals. He is a recognized author with dozens of titles in business and fiction to his credit. One of his endeavors is to help those who want to see their own book in print. He does this through his trademarked Book Whispering Process (TM).

The author is not an official spokesperson for any organization or person mentioned herein.

(c) Copyright 2020 A+ Results LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Your comments are welcome... Please observe some ground rules. No profanity, vulgarity, or personal attacks. Profanity, vulgarity and personal attacks not only betray a lack of vocabulary and imagination, they also are the hallmarks of bigotry, and bigotry is the hallmark of someone who is fundamentally insecure in their views. Facts are always welcome.

If you believe Government is NOT the answer to all our problems, you will want to read
 Godvernment: Government as God

Choose Love

The other day I was taking an Uber to the airport and chatted with the driver along the way. When I mentioned my wife, she asked how long I have been married. I told that this year will mark our 43rd anniversary. She immediately asked how I had managed to stay married for so long.

I told her that every day I chose to love my wife more than I love anyone else.

"Love is a choice." I told her. "It is something you choose. It is not something that happens to you."

Hollywood loves to sell us on the fabulous lie that we fall into (and out of) love. 

While it is true that sexual attraction can happen to you, love cannot. Sexual attraction may involve hormones, pheromones, and other stimuli that bombard you, so in that regard attraction can happen to you. Unlike sexual attraction, love doesn't happen to you, it is something you choose.

And before we move off the topic of sexual attraction, while that can happen to you and catch you unawares, what you do about that attraction is entirely your choice. You can ignore it. Walk away from it. Or, you can indulge it. Regardless, after the initial unexpected jolt, what happens next depends entirely upon the choices you make. So, own it.

When we foolishly and erroneously talk of love as something we fall into or out of, we willfully ignore and excuse ourselves for the choices we make. 

Love is not something you fall into. You are walking down the street, not watching you step and accidently step into an uncovered hole at the bottom of which is a pile of love. Likewise you aren't walking down the street covered in love and fall into a hole and the love you felt for someone is suddenly thrown off, out of reach on the street above you where you walked a moment before.

Let's move off for a moment from the topic of the love that binds the lives of people together in a relationship that brings out the best in both of them. Let's talk about the broader situation where we need to choose to love.

Choosing to love is the hard choice that makes life much easier. Just as choosing to hate is the easy choice that makes life harder.

Today, we are living in a world that is being torn asunder with hatred and enmity. Too often our political and sometimes even our religious leaders teach us that those who don't agree with us are evil and hateful. They are bad people. 

This is taught in political rallies all the time. 

The people in the other party want to destroy you and your way of life. They must be stopped at any cost. Whatever you do to thwart them is good, and whatever they do is always bad. They are a threat to your very existence.

In his Sermon on the Mount Jesus of Nazareth taught that we should love those that hate us and pray for those who despitefully use us. Christ showed that God hates the sin and loves the sinner.

We can, and should, stand up for what we believe is right. However, we must not hate those who don't agree with us. In fact, we must choose to love them in spite of whatever "sin" they embrace and even in spite of however they may "despitefully use [us]."

When others actually harm you, or even appear to be supporting things that may harm you, it is easy to hate them. Unfortunately, when you choose to hate, you fill your life with hate.

Hate is the easy choice that makes your own life hard.

In contrast, when you choose to love, you make a hard choice which ends up making your life so much easier because when your life is filled with love, everything is easier to bear.

Just to be clear, I know that evil is real. I know that there absolute, cosmic standards which differentiate between right and wrong, good and evil. Yes, I believe that both Christ and Lucifer are real individuals, each with their own agendas and followers, both seen and unseen.

I also know that there will come a great day of reckoning where each of us in turn will stand before God and account for our actions, choices, deeds, words, and thoughts in this life. 

While I can see the actions of a person and typically judge correctly if they are good or evil, I can never have the knowledge needed to be able to say if that person is good or evil. That judgement is left wholly to God, because he sees the entire picture of each of us.

The great news is that each of is given the gift of choice. We have our own agency and freedom to choose. However, we don't have freedom from the consequences of our choices. Many of those consequences are as inevitable as the effects of gravity.

When we choose to hate, the consequence is that our thoughts and feelings in all aspects of our lives become tainted with the grit of bad feelings. Too often this results in the destruction of the loving relationships we have in our lives. Then, we end up alone, bitter, and hateful, i.e., full of hate.

When we choose to love, even when unlovely things happen or are done to us, our thoughts and feelings are lubricated with love. Bad things happen, but they don't destroy us. Others try to wound us with their words and deeds, but regardless of the harm they do us, we know that they are harming themselves even more and we feel sorrow for them. 

When we choose to respond with love to hate, it confuses people. It also deprives them of their opportunity to control us. If we only give love for love and harm for harm, then anyone can control us. They can lead us to destruction with words and deeds which appear to be kind and loving. They can drive is to do great evils by prodding us with anger and blatant harms.

I could go on, but I believe I have made my point. I hope you will ponder my points and add your own. 

Our ability to choose how we act, instead of reacting, is a singular quality that sets us apart from the brute animals. The only way we will quell the divisive and violent nature of our society (and our lives) is to choose love.

See Tom's political views on Facebook at: https://www.facebook.com/TomSheppardPoliticalViews/
Follow Tom on Twitter: @ThomasKSheppard

Tom Sheppard is a business consultant and coach to small business owners and individuals. He is a recognized author with dozens of titles in business and fiction to his credit. One of his endeavors is to help those who want to see their own book in print. He does this through his trademarked Book Whispering Process (TM).

The author is not an official spokesperson for any organization or person mentioned herein.

(c) Copyright 2020 A+ Results LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Your comments are welcome... Please observe some ground rules. No profanity, vulgarity, or personal attacks. Profanity, vulgarity and personal attacks not only betray a lack of vocabulary and imagination, they also are the hallmarks of bigotry, and bigotry is the hallmark of someone who is fundamentally insecure in their views. Facts are always welcome.

If you believe Government is NOT the answer to all our problems, you will want to read
 Godvernment: Government as God