Showing posts with label Capitalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Capitalism. Show all posts

Friday, September 4, 2020

The Psychology of Power

Image (c) YAYImages and Depositphotos.com

                              This article is an excerpt from Godvernment: Government as God 

Tom Sheppard
9/4/2020

Mythology and the Psychology of Power

Among the supernatural creatures of Celtic myths (the faeries), there are two primary camps of supernatural beings, the Seelie Court and the Unseelie Court.  While both of these groups have powers beyond what humans have, the difference between them lies in their philosophies of power. 

The Seelie Court believes that its power should be used only when necessary to help humanity or its own kind to live better, happier lives.

The Unseelie Court operates on the premise that power is only power when it is exercised, and that it should be exercised often and freely and solely for the benefit, advantage, or enjoyment of the one wielding the power. The Unseelie Court is not a pleasant group for any unfortunate, powerless humans to interact with.

In contrast, the Seelie Court, while it can be dangerous, won’t abuse humans just because it can.

What the myths reveal about the inhabitants of the realm of Faerie provide us with useful insights into human nature.  And those insights into human nature uncover why Godvernment will inevitably fail in its effort to create Homo Superioris.

People who embrace the Unseelie approach to power generally fall into the category of mindsets which psychologists refer to as sociopathic. Sympathy and empathy for those who are affected by their use (or abuse) of power do not temper their actions as they do for most people.

Unseelies are always drawn to power.  The degree to which the Godvernmentalists succeed in making government powerful is a direct attraction to the Unseelie.  These Unseelie people will readily take government jobs as the avenue to power, and along the way, they will routinely use their power for their own pleasure, or simply because they can.  The use of their power will almost uniformly leave a wake of damaged lives and people behind and around them, and they will tend to attract like minds, so their inner circle will be heavily populated by Unseelies.

As these people pursue power, they will generally succeed because they are utterly ruthless.  They will use whatever tools come to their hands to remove people above them, below them, or beside them who are perceived to be in any way hindering their gathering and use of power.

For Unseelies, the gathering of power into the Godvernment is the establishment of an environment that will promote their worst natures.  This is in sharp contrast to the purported goal of Godvernment to create an utopian environment for the creation of Homo Superioris (Superman).

If you accept the belief of the Godvernmentalists that, to create a better human being, you have to first create the right environment, then you are defeated by your own principles.

Creating a Godvernment where human intellect is worshipped and power is consolidated into the hands of a few, who are supposed to use it to help the rest of us, will create institutions that are controlled by Unseelies.  This corrupted power structure will not have any desire (or ability) to create a Superman.  After all, if they succeed, they will have given power away into the hands of a creature who will be inherently more powerful than they are.

Some will argue this point and protest that the altruists will win out and move the noble enterprise forward.  Unfortunately, as I noted above, their very founding premises argue against them.

If circumstance determines behavior, then circumstances that enable Unseelie behavior will produce Unseelie behavior.

In sharp contrast with the idealistic Godvernmentalists, God worshippers believe that you must first change the inner person.  Then the inner person will change behaviors, and that will change circumstances.

This is the fundamental reason why faith-based 12-step programs for addicts of all sorts are consistently, measurably more effective than their agnostic or atheistic counterparts.  Successful addiction recovery programs aim to change the addict internally as the means to change their external behaviors.


Food for thought!

See Tom's political views on Facebook at: https://www.facebook.com/TomSheppardPoliticalViews/ 
Follow Tom on Twitter: @ThomasKSheppard 

Tom Sheppard is a business consultant and coach to small business owners and individuals. He is a recognized author with dozens of titles in business and fiction to his credit. One of his endeavors is to help those who want to see their own book in print. He does this through his trademarked Book Whispering Process (TM). 

The author is not an official spokesperson for any organization or person mentioned herein. 

(c) Copyright 2020 A+ Results LLC. All Rights Reserved. 

Your comments are welcome. Please observe some ground rules. No profanity, vulgarity, or personal attacks. Profanity, vulgarity and personal attacks not only betray a lack of vocabulary and imagination, they also are the hallmarks of bigotry, and bigotry is the hallmark of someone who is fundamentally insecure in their views. Facts are always welcome.

If you believe Government is NOT the answer to all our problems, you will want to read
 Godvernment: Government as God
Click on the image below to buy your copy today

Godvernment is available in both paperback and ebook format through Amazon.

Civil Society Rests on the 10 Commandments

Image (c) talitha and Depositphotos.com

This article is an excerpt from Godvernment: Government as God

Tom Sheppard

9/4/2020

While many today are clamoring for the exile of religion from the public square and taking down the Ten Commandments from our courthouses, they do so without thought or understanding of how the Ten Commandments are perfectly designed to allow us to enjoy the fruits of a civil society.

        The Ten Commandments give us a glimpse into the stupid and awful things people can do.  I have taken the liberty of rephrasing them below, along with some elaboration of what these say about human nature.

1.       Worship only God.  When you put your faith in anything other than God, you will be let down.  [for more on this topic see Faith in Who or What]

2.       Don’t worship the work of your own hands.  When you devote all your time, energy, and passion to the acquisition of material things, you are worshipping the work of your own hands.  You are behaving as though your happiness and long-term well-being is dependent on, and attainable through, your things.

3.       Don’t refer to God rashly or foolishly.  People who are smart or know a lot frequently get an inflated opinion of themselves.  They begin to think that they are smarter than God, and certainly smarter than people who believe in God.  This leads to a casual dismissal of wisdom which has helped build and preserve civil societies throughout history.

4.       Remember the Sabbath day and keep it holy.  Take one day in a week, and set it aside to do God’s work. 

Being actively engaged in a noble work that is greater than yourself gives your own life perspective and makes you more grateful for the abundance you enjoy.

5.       Show respect to your parents.  Many people today disregard the wisdom that has been earned by those who have come before us.  First in deserving respect are our parents.  Instead, people succumb to another tenet of the Communist Manifesto and allow themselves to be separated from and despise the teachings of their parents. 

Divorcing yourself from the wisdom of your antecedents, you make yourself easy prey to slick arguments which sound good and seem to make sense, but which cannot stand the test of time—a fact known to your parents, who have already stood the test of time.

6.       Don’t murder.  There is much ado today about “Black Lives Matter.”  Some are willing to justify killing police officers because they feel that the killing of someone who is a threat to their fellow human beings is somehow unjustified because he is someone’s son and his skin color is black. 

God’s laws are colorblind.  He commands that we have a healthy respect for all human life and that we only take it when absolutely necessary. 

Valuing the life of our neighbor creates a society that is nurturing, caring, safe, and protective of its members. 

When murder runs rampant in the streets, unchecked by the enforcement of laws, all men and women must look to the strength of their own arm to protect their own life and the lives of those they love.  Civil society disintegrates into chaos and barbarism when basic respect for human life doesn’t restrain the behavior of people.

7.       Don’t commit adultery.  There are at least two points in this commandment.  Adultery is when a married person has sexual relations with someone who is not his or her lawful spouse. 

When adultery happens, at least one person has become a liar, violating the solemn oaths he or she has sworn to forsake all others, to love and cherish. 

The second point is that an attack on the institution of marriage is an attack on the basic building block of civil society.  If the most intimate family relationship is not safe from predation, then a higher level of civilization is unsustainable.  Eventually, every family that wants to maintain its integrity will feel the need to separate from society at large and keep its activities close to home. 

The third point of this commandment is related to the first.  It is trust.  Mutual trust is utterly essential for any relationship—marital, societal, or fraternal—to function effectively.  A military unit functions effectively when each member knows that all other members of the team will do their part.  That is universally true for any society to function. 

Without trust, no group of two or more people can cooperate to achieve things that are beyond the capability of the lone individual.

8.       Don’t steal.  Where the commandment against adultery is meant to allow a civil society to function because of security and trust within the family, the injunction against taking what you have not earned is designed to allow people to work together without the need to constantly watch over their belongings and food. 

When theft runs rampant, the faithful provider has no choice other than to take every effort to secure his or her food and other possessions.  At an extreme, the individual cannot participate in civil society because she or he is too busy protecting what has been obtained through their industry.

9.       Don’t lie.  As mentioned above, when discussing one of the corrosive effects of adultery, lying or deceit renders an individual untrustworthy. 

Untrustworthy people cannot build a civil society.  That is not to say that they cannot build a society, but it will not be a civil society, and civil society provides the opportunities for the higher expressions of human beauty, such as the arts and literature.

10.   Do not covet your neighbor’s wife, house, servants, animals, or anything else.  Lusting after the abundance of another has the effect of making you ignore the abundance in your own life. 

Coveting is a gateway anti-social behavior.  All too often, envying what someone else has leads to trying to find ways to take from the neighbor for yourself.  To do that, you end up lying, stealing, committing adultery by seducing the neighbor’s spouse, or perhaps even killing your neighbor to get what they have.  And, just in case you missed it, when all that bad behavior becomes known, that brings shame to your parents.

Today is Worse Than Days Gone By

God knows his children.  He knows both the good and the bad that they are capable of.  He also knows that in our days, people will be much worse than in former times.  Nearly 2,000 years ago, he showed his Apostle Paul our day and commanded him to write of it, so that we would be forewarned and have a witness of the wisdom and foreknowledge of God.

This know also, that in the last days, perilous times shall come.

For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, traitors, heady, high minded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.

For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts, ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. 
Now as Jannes and Jambres[i] withstood Moses, so do these also resist the truth: men of corrupt minds, reprobate concerning the faith. 

2 Timothy 3:1-8

       I believe that any honest assessment of our society today will demonstrate that all these bad behaviors are not only extant today, but are actually celebrated in many parts of our society.  When I say celebrated, I mean that instead of being decried as bad behaviors, they are held up as evidence of being modern and enlightened.

Traitors, for instance.  Most people would say being a traitor is a bad thing, yet many will praise the likes of Edward Snowden as being a noble man of conscience for stealing secrets from the National Security Agency and delivering them both to the press and to the enemies of the United States.  Yet, regardless of opinion, there can be no debate regarding the fact that to do what he did required him to break the oaths of secrecy which he swore.

Incontinent is another thing.  Today, we hear ads for Depends and think of incontinence as having something to do with not having control over your bowels.  However, incontinence actually means “lacking self-control.”  Paul, in his letter to Timothy, was talking about how people would come to celebrate their lack of self-restraint.

And that last verse about Jannes and Jambre?  Paul was referring to the court magicians of Pharoah who did their own imitations of the signs Moses gave Pharoah and convinced him not to let the Israelites go, in spite of all the plagues that came.

Our Poor are Rich

Today, we are awash in people who are ungrateful for the abundance they enjoy.  You don’t believe me?  Consider this, the average “poor” person in the U.S. today lives indoors in a regularly constructed building.  They have electricity, indoor plumbing, television, cell phones, a fridge, a stove, perhaps even a car or two, some kind of stereo, and ready access to food and clothing. 

In contrast, the poor I worked with in Ecuador lived in cane shacks built on stilts over top of open sewers.  Their water was either delivered into a barrel in front of the house or caught from the rain.  And when it rained, most folks went out into the street and used the opportunity to get a rare shower.  They had no electricity.  The one house in the neighborhood that had electricity and a fridge used the fridge as a small business, selling cold drinks and frozen treats.  Stoves were run from small propane tanks.  In short, they lived every day slightly less well off than most of us do when we go camping.

Having seen real poverty, where children go swimming in open sewers, have no shirts or shoes, and no healthcare, I find myself shaking my head in disbelief when I see and hear the “poor” in the U.S. complaining, because, while they live like the upper middle class of most third-world countries, they don’t have all of the creature comforts that others enjoy.

Their answer to this disparity is to covet what others have and advocate that the government steal from others on their behalf.  Or, they justify criminal activities to rob and steal directly to get the material things which others have earned by their own hard work and industry.

Paul, in his letter to Timothy, left out the usual bad behaviors that have prevailed throughout history—those that the Ten Commandments were designed to counter.

Our Good Nature

The evil that men do lives after them; the good is oft interred with their bones.

William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar

After reading the last segment, you are probably convinced that I have a pretty low opinion of people.  Perhaps you believe, as some religions preach, that we are basically evil people when we come into this world.  Nothing could be further from the truth.  I believe that people come into this world with a disposition to be good. 

Unfortunately, for all of us, the pleasures and distresses of the flesh are powerful intoxicants, and they too often divert us from our good intentions.  Thus the verity of the aphorism, “the spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak.”

Genuinely good people are capable of such incredibly selfless acts and kindness as to be breathtaking.

When I think of the good nature of people, I think of the firefighters who went into the twin towers in New York on September 11, 2001, and those who go into burning buildings every day.  They put their lives at risk to save the lives and property of others.

Likewise, I think of the men and women who are ordinary police officers.  Every day, they put their lives at risk so that the rest of us can live without the fear of falling prey to violent people who are gleefully embracing the worst behaviors they can exhibit.

Mother Teresa is recognized the world over for her decades-long, selfless work to physically and spiritually administer salvation to impoverished orphans in Calcutta, India.

A survey by sociologist James Davison Hunter testifies to the underlying moral consensus that still exists in America. Hunter's survey found that 97 percent of Americans agree with the statement that "with hard work and perseverance, anyone can succeed in America."  Ninety-six percent agree that "American democracy is only as strong as the virtue of its citizens."  Ninety-three percent agree that "America's contribution is one of expanding freedom for more and more people."

Nearly every major religion in the world is built on a foundation of trying to encourage people to cultivate their better natures.  I believe that Jesus of Nazareth put it best when he encapsulated good behavior in what has become known as The Golden Rule: “Love your neighbor as yourself.”

When we treat others with the respect, kindness, attentiveness, compassion, and care that we would like to receive in return, we establish the firmest foundation for a civil society.

Becoming a Good Person

Good people—truly good people—are those who not only behave well, but really don’t even want to behave badly.

They don’t lust after their neighbor’s goods.  They don’t lie.  They don’t steal.  They don’t murder.  They don’t commit adultery.  They are respectful of their parents and the wisdom of their antecedents.  They are actively engaged in a good and noble cause that is greater than themselves.

They do all these things because, although they can behave badly, they don’t enjoy behaving badly and they relish the fruits of good behavior.

In the interest of being honest, I confess that I am not a consistently, truly good person.  If anyone goes looking for bad behaviors in my life, they will find them.  However, I need to confess a couple of more things on this point.

I am closer to consistently being a truly good person now than I have ever been before.  I believe that I can continue to improve and become, more consistently, a truly good person.  The atoning sacrifice of Jesus Christ makes it possible for me to put my bad behaviors behind me and make real progress toward becoming the kind of person God wants me to be.

The effort to become a good person is not trivial, and it doesn’t have a really firm finish line in this life.  It is, in fact, more of a process than a destination.

The first step toward becoming a good person is to have the desire to be a good person.

The second step is to immediately begin to act like a good person.

The third step is to immediately begin to think and talk like a truly good person.

Many of us have heard the advice, “fake it until you make it.”  When it comes to becoming a good person, this is better phrased as “behave the way you should until you begin to enjoy behaving the way you should.”

When you reach the stage where you no longer enjoy bad behaviors and you truly enjoy a life filled with good behavior, you have become a truly good person.

I look forward to the day when I am changed completely into a truly good person and I have no more desire or disposition to behave badly.

For those of you who think that living among a lot of truly good people would be boring, I am here to tell you that there are a lot of interesting and fun things to do that don’t involve damaging myself or others in any way.  However, it is really easy to indulge in bad behavior for your “fun.”  Remember the aphorism, “That which we attain too easily, we esteem too lightly,” or in other words, nothing worth having (or becoming) is going to be easy.

Becoming a Good Society

        A truly good society is nothing more or less than a society that is peopled by truly good individuals.

In a truly good society, individuals have freedom of conscience and they are secure in their property and their person.

This freedom of conscience means that they can act according to their own beliefs as long as their actions do not persecute others for their beliefs or threaten the person or property of others.

Being secure in their person means that the society is one where violence against individuals does not exist.  No one has to fear death at the hands of a fellow citizen.

Being secure in their property means that people are able to live without fear that others will arbitrarily or unjustly take their property or deny them use and enjoyment of their own property.

To put it in terms of the Founding Fathers, we are endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable rights.  Among these are the rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

When it comes to a prescription for how we can become a good society, the primary difference between Christianity and collectivism is this:

Christianity seeks to make a good society by establishing just laws to protect freedom of conscience and property rights and encouraging individuals to willingly, individually decide to do their best to submit themselves to the will of God.

Please note here that submission to the will of God and submission to the will of a cleric are not the same things.  This unfortunate fact is all too often the reason why religions have been agitators of significant human misery and warfare.

All too often, organized religion is quickly converted from a noble mission of helping people to create a community of individuals striving to support each other in their efforts to understand and live the will of God into a vehicle for the personal aggrandizement and wealth of the clergy, collectively and individually.

In contrast with the voluntary submission that God seeks from us, collectivism and Godvernment really doesn’t care whether our submission is forced or not.  It attempts to legislate, bully, and forcibly compel every individual to adopt a submissive attitude toward government, accepting the bureaucracy as the final arbiter of who is a good person and who is not. 

Once Godvernment gains the absolute power it needs to survive, its agents will begin their programs to exterminate “bad” people so that they can create a good society. 

In a world where government replaces God as our savior, bad people are those who don’t wholeheartedly support every mandate handed down by our government.  And bad people, with their failure to energetically get on board with the dictates of government, are a danger to society.

The U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights established a structure where the government was limited to establishing an environment where people would be able to have freedom of conscience while being secure in both their persons and property.

Today, many people are actively seeking to negate the U.S. Constitution, in whole or in part, in order to establish a government that is both the sole object of our devotion and the only arbiter of what rights we will be allowed to enjoy.

This anti-constitutional effort is the greatest threat to the happiness of the people of the U.S. and the world.  If it is successful, it will mean that the rule of law and the chance for a truly good society will be utterly beyond the reach of generations to come, until the Godvernment is removed from its throne and constitutional government is once again the law of the land.



[i] Just in case you don’t get the reference to Jannes and Jambres, I looked them up.  It seems they are the magicians of Pharoah who, when Moses invoked the plagues on Egypt, did their own parlor tricks to convince Pharoah that God was not really backing Moses.  They succeeded so well in blinding the mind of Pharoah to the reality that was before him, that he resisted God until all the firstborn of Egypt died in a single night. 

I am going to go out on a limb and speculate that they had a hand in convincing him later to take his army in pursuit of the Israelites, an effort which led to the utter destruction of Pharoah’s army.


Food for thought!

See Tom's political views on Facebook at: https://www.facebook.com/TomSheppardPoliticalViews/ 
Follow Tom on Twitter: @ThomasKSheppard 

Tom Sheppard is a business consultant and coach to small business owners and individuals. He is a recognized author with dozens of titles in business and fiction to his credit. One of his endeavors is to help those who want to see their own book in print. He does this through his trademarked Book Whispering Process (TM). 

The author is not an official spokesperson for any organization or person mentioned herein. 

(c) Copyright 2020 A+ Results LLC. All Rights Reserved. 

Your comments are welcome. Please observe some ground rules. No profanity, vulgarity, or personal attacks. Profanity, vulgarity and personal attacks not only betray a lack of vocabulary and imagination, they also are the hallmarks of bigotry, and bigotry is the hallmark of someone who is fundamentally insecure in their views. Facts are always welcome.

If you believe Government is NOT the answer to all our problems, you will want to read
 Godvernment: Government as God
Click on the image below to buy your copy today

Godvernment is available in both paperback and ebook format through Amazon.

Friday, November 22, 2019

Socialism is Economic Rape

Photo (C) Katarzyna Bialasiewicz photographee.eu / DepositPhotos.com

Tom Sheppard
11/22/2019

When a woman is raped, a man is forcibly taking something from her that she does not want to give him.   The rapist uses his cunning and superior strength to overpower his victim and do as he pleases with her, without any regard to her feelings, hopes, or wants. If she resists, and he is able, he will beat her and restrain her so that she will either be compliant, unconscious, or bound and unable to further resist.

Just like the rapist, a socialist government takes what it wants from its citizens without any regard to their feelings, hopes, or wants.  The socialist government uses the power of its police and military to forcibly take everything it wants and leave its citizens only with what it feels inclined to provide them.  Anyone who is foolish enough to resist the forcible rape is likely to end up in prison or dead.

If you don't believe that socialist governments work this way, then do just two things:

  1. Read (or listen to) The Gulag Archipelago by  Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, and 
  2. Look at what is happening in Venezuela right now as the populace suffers from scarcity brought about by their socialist government while controlling a land of abundance.

That should be enough to make my point, but if it isn't, you can read some history about

  • what Adolf Hitler, the head of the National Socialist German Workers (NAZI) party did.  
  • Or Pol Pot, the head of the communist Khmer Rouge who took over Cambodia.  
  • Or the history of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics where Josef Stalin deliberately slaughtered millions of Russians who didn't embrace his plans with sufficient enthusiasm. 
  • Or. follow the adventures of the handsome and charismatic Che Guevara as he tortured and murdered his way across the Caribbean, Central and South America, and Africa trying to 'persuade' people to embrace communism.  Wikipedia notes that "... he murdered political opponents, eliminated the free press, and put homosexuals in forced labor camps."
  • Or, read about Che's good friend Fidel Castro and the prisons in Cuba he has filled with political prisoners who didn't agree with his communist/socialist ideas.

Image result for che guevara
Che Guevara

Communism and Socialism

Just as the puma and mountain lion are the same animal, so too are socialism and communism.  Both are rooted in the philosophy explained by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in The Communist Manifesto.  The slight difference is that communism actively seeks to do away with all other economic and political orders and run the entire world, while socialism throws nationalism into the mix with the aim of making sure that the socialists from a particular country are all in charge of the world, or at least most of it.

Socialism Must Use Force

Socialism requires that all private resources become owned by or 100% aligned with the purposes of the state.  Very few people will willingly give all they have to government bureaucrats.  Even the leading socialists in the USA today won't do that.  They are hypocrites and liars who don't walk the talk.  That means that the soldiers and police will have to come in to force the compliance of anyone who fails to cooperate and behave as the bureaucrats direct.

When socialists come to power one of the first things they do is they use the coercive power of government to forcibly transfer ownership of many companies and even whole industries from shareholders and investors to the government.  The government doesn't pay for these companies.  This is a direct violation of the Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution prohibiting the government from illegal searches and seizures.

To be clear about this, shareholders are not just a bunch of fat cats with wads of cash.  Most retirement funds (like yours) are invested in stocks and mutual funds (which also are invested in stocks).  So, when the government takes ownership of a company without paying for it, they are taking money right out of the retirement funds of millions of working-class people, helping to ensure that their Golden Years of retirement are hungry, cold, and poverty-stricken.

You, as the working class person hoping for a decent retirement someday, just got raped by the socialist government.

When socialists come to power, they immediately raise taxes and use the coercive powers of government to seize the property of anyone who fails to pay "their fair share" as defined by the very luxurious-living leaders of the socialist government.  Your wages and taxes are both set by a government bureaucrat who decides your wages based not on your wants or needs, or how well you do your job, or how demanding or dangerous your job might be. The socialist government bureaucrat sets your wages at what s/he feels you need in order to survive, because in this socialist utopia there is officially no such thing as "getting ahead."  Unless, of course, you become a socialist government bureaucrat and can manage to claw your way up the government hierarchy to a position where some other socialist government bureaucrat above you has decided that your contribution to society, through your amazing government service, is sufficient to warrant a slightly better lifestyle through things like access to the top-bureaucrats-only stores when you can get almost as much decent food as you want, almost whenever you want it.

So, you got raped again either by the tax man, or the some other socialist government bureaucrat who decided how much need to survive.

Of course, you can always live a bit better by becoming a criminal and buying what you can afford through the black market.  If you get caught with this contraband coffee or bread, you will likely lose your job, spend time in jail, perhaps even get sent to a re-education facility where you will be shown how much better it is to embrace socialism than to be beaten periodically and work as a slave laborer.

So, you got raped by the socialist law enforcement.  They may, in fact, physically rape you to help you realize how good you have it when you are playing by the official socialist rules.

On the other hand, the criminals will always be there.  Capitalists in socialist countries are, by definition criminals.  Some will be offering to meet legitimate needs for things like good food or decent appliances.  Others will be offering protection from the police or other thugs.  Either way, unless you throw in your lot with the criminal capitalists, you have no chance of enjoying a life that is any less miserable than all of your neighbors.

Of course, joining the criminal capitalists, you risk getting raped by them, and by the socialists.

The Politics of Envy is a Lie

Socialists build their support using the politics of envy.  They pit the 99% against the 1% and feed the 99% on dreams of living in some measure of the opulence of the 99% by taking it away from the 99% and giving a nice piece of it to them.  The reality plays our very differently.

When the socialist governments confiscate the property and money of the wealthy 1%, they don't distribute it to the masses.  Instead, they use if for themselves.  You don't believe me?  Consider this, when you take away a million dollar house from someone in a newly socialist state, who can buy it to give you the million dollars it is supposedly worth?  The answer is... no one can because no one own owns any personal property anymore so it all belongs to the government.  That means the real property of the rich and famous cannot be sold.  Instead, it must be used.  And who deserves that luxurious house more than the locally appointed government bureaucrat who is laboring so diligently to make sure that no one is holding back any personal property or money, or labor, from the state?

So, not only does the rich owner of the million dollar house get raped by the socialists, so do you.

What about our great jobs!  Well, in a socialist state, labor is optimized according to the wisdom of government bureaucrats.  You get the job where they think you will make the best contribution to the greater good.  And, your boss will be someone who is politically connected within the socialist party, without regard to who is best at the job.  You too will not get promoted until you get all the right political tickets punched.  And, in a truly socialist society your promotion won't get you any more pay, because you don't need it and giving one person more pay than another would antithetical to the egalitarian notions underpinning the entire socialist philosophy.

Once again, you got raped.

It Won't Work That Way for Us

This is another great lie of the socialists everywhere and in the US particularly.  All of them deny or ignore the lessons of the history of abusive socialist governments by treating themselves to the conceit that we are much smarter than all the socialists who have gone before and we will do it right, avoiding the errors and abuses of past efforts and failures.
To believe that we are so much smarter than any who have gone before is simply vanity and conceit. 
Just as the leopard cannot change its spots, humanity is powerless to change its nature.  You can change yourself, but when it comes to changing someone else, the only power you have to either 1) accept them, hoping they will change, or 2) kill them so that they cannot do or say anything to contradict the perfect socialist fantasy.  And that is exactly why socialist governments are renowned for killing millions of their own people before they ever go to war with outsiders.

On this point, about recognizing the flaws of human nature, the men who wrote the US Constitution expressly recognized and made provisions for the fact that human beings are not angels.  They even used that term in the Federalist Papers where they explained and made the case for the US Constitution.  They had already seen how badly people could behave under their Articles of Confederation and had no desire to repeat their former mistakes in setting up a suitable government for this nation.  Nope, I am not giving you that reference, because I want you to spend time sifting through The Federalist Papers to find it yourself and read some advice directly from our founding fathers a little along the way.

Conclusion

Nearly six thousand years of recorded human history, with its repetitive wars, conquests, and countless perfidies both personal and national provides everyone with one clear insight.  Human nature has not materially changed in all of recorded history.  While some people will act selflessly, there are always enough selfish, greedy people out there that we must build our societies, governments, and laws in ways that will protect us from the depredations of those who are willing to get what they want by taking it from others.

Accepting and supporting socialism is not social justice.  Socialism is  rape.

References
The Communist Manifesto
The Federalist Papers
The US Constitution and Bill of Rights
The Articles of Confederation of the United States of America (not to be confused with anything associated with the US Civil War or the Confederate States of America)

Tom Sheppard is a business consultant and coach to small business owners and individuals. He is a recognized author with dozens of titles in business and fiction to his credit. One of his endeavors is to help those who want to see their own book in print. He does this through his trademarked Book Whispering Process (TM). 
The author is not an official spokesperson for any organization or person mentioned herein. 

(c) Copyright 2019 A+ Results LLC. All Rights Reserved. 

 Your comments are welcome... Please observe some ground rules. No profanity, vulgarity, or personal attacks. Profanity, vulgarity and personal attacks not only betray a lack of vocabulary and imagination, they also are the hallmarks of bigotry, and bigotry is the hallmark of someone who is fundamentally insecure in their views. Facts are always welcome.


Wealthy Socialists are Liars and Hypocrites

Tom Sheppard
11/22/2019

What do Bernie Sanders, George Soros, Elizabeth Warren, Michael Moore, Susan Sarandon, Danny Devito, and Mark Ruffalo (AKA Bruce Banner) all have in common?

They all profess to embrace socialism, but they don't practice what they preach.  In other words, they are liars and hypocrites.

Unlike Mahatma Ghandi, who literally gave his all to live his beliefs, these wannabe-socialists don't walk the talk.  Not. At. All.

Granted, Elizabeth Warren claims to be "capitalist to the bone."  Notwithstanding her very public claim, the policies she proposes are decidedly socialist.  So, if it walks like a duck and it quacks like a duck, I am going to call it a duck, or in this case she walks and talks like a socialist, so I am calling her a socialist.

Here is the real test they should all take to see if they are really ready and willing to embrace socialism.  Let them give everything they own to charities for the poor (or the government) and make sure they work at least 40 hours per week while only getting an income of $45k per year, pretax.  This means they give up their bank accounts, investments, real estate, royalties, and all other sources of income except their job, which will never pay them any more than $45k per year.

Why $45k?  Because that is about the median pre-tax household income in the US.  In other words 50% of the people in the US live on that, or less.  The other 50% live on that, or more.  The actual median may be more or less than that, and we can agree to adjust the number to that, but the point is that they need to live by what ordinary, working-class people can expect to earn, and no more.

Did I mention this would be pre-tax?  Yes, taxes should be taken out of that gross pay.  Take the same amount of taxes out that anyone in that income bracket would usually pay.  That means their take-home pay is reduced by at least one-third, down to about $30k+ per year to actually live on.

Let them buy or rent a house, pay for their meals, cars, and transportation with this after-tax income.

Furthermore, regardless of what they do, contribute, invent, write, say, etc. limit their income to that $45k pre-tax ceiling.  Anything they get paid above that number goes to the state.  They never get to enjoy any fruits of their labor beyond what the $45k pre-tax income can buy.

"I wrote a best-selling book," Sanders told The New York Times in April. "If you write a best-selling book, you can be a millionaire, too."
Bernie Sanders 

Bernie, that simply isn't true under socialism.  That is only true under capitalism.  Under socialism, you don't get to keep the fruits of your labors.  All the fruits of your labors go the government and the government bureaucrats give you back what they feel you need to live.  

A socialist government owns you, and all you produce.

Ann Schmidt reports that "after receiving pressure to release his tax returns during his presidential bid, Sanders released 10 years' worth of returns ... According to those returns, the independent Vermont senator's adjusted gross income was $561,293 in 2018 and he paid a 26 percent effective tax rate. In 2017, his adjusted gross income was $1,131,925."

So, Bernie would go from an annual income of anywhere from $500k or $1,132k down to just $45k per year.  On the low end, that means he would give up 90% of his income.  On the high-end, he would be giving up 96% of his current annual income. 

Given that his campaign workers had to go on strike just to get him to pay them $15 per hour, do you really think he would be happy to give up all that income and live on $45k per year?  I don't think so.

How much would they be giving up?

According to my research, what follows are the estimates of net worth of the folks I named above, in ascending order.
  • Bernie Sanders (Net worth estimate: $2 million)
  • Elizabeth Warren (Net worth estimate: $12 million)
  • Michael Moore (Net worth estimate: $50 million)
  • Susan Sarandon (Net worth estimate: $50 million)
  • Danny DeVito (Net worth estimate: $80 million)
  • Mark Ruffalo (Net worth estimate: $20 million)
  • George Soros (Net worth estimate: $8,300 million)
While this is a lot of money, net worth doesn't really tell the whole story of what they would give up if the USA embraced socialism, as these folks profess to want.  They would give up much more.

Net worth represents the total value of your assets less the debts associated with them.  So, if you have, as many of these folks do, a house worth $1 million and it has a mortgage of $500k, the net worth of that house is $500k.

Under socialism, you would not only get that $500k mortgage cancelled, you would also lose ownership of and the use of that million dollar home.  

All their private planes, mansions, luxury cars, fine foods, expensive clothes, etc. would be taken from them.  They would all become property of the state and they could only buy what they could afford on their $45k per year (less taxes) salary.

Does anyone really believe that these very wealthy people would be at all happy about giving up ALL that they have earned and ALL that they may yet earn, for any reason, ever?  No, they don't want to give that up.  

They want YOU to give up your opportunity to ever become wealthy like them. 

Capitalism = Opportunity

None of these people inherited their wealth.  They all earned it by their skills and ingenuity in a capitalist economy that lets people vote with their money for the most skillful and ingenious by paying for goods and services.  Under socialism, the economic mechanisms that allowed them to attain their wealth would not be available to them, or anyone else.

So, if they say they want socialism, and socialism would take away all that they have, and they don't want to give up all that they have, what is it that they really want?

Actors like Sarandon, Ruffalo, and DeVito would be paid by the government only what a bureaucrat decided was appropriate.  Likewise movie directors such as Michael Moore.  And, when their performances waned in value for the state, their privileges would be curtailed or revoked and they would soon find themselves living hand-to-mouth, like every other impoverished citizen. Oh, and when they produced a "block-buster movie" they would still only get paid their $45k per year, no matter what the show did at the box office or in video sales all over the world.  As good socialists, they would all be happy to see that their acting and directing efforts produced such a wonderful cash flow for the state.

In a socialist state, wealthy investors like George Soros would not exist, nor would they be allowed to exist.  Their very activities would be unlawful.  Soros himself would likely be killed outright, or arrested and convicted on trumped up charges of treason against the state. Regardless of the path of his fall, all his wealth would be confiscated, with selected holdings made available for use by social party loyalists and those in political power.

What do they really want?

I suggest that what these wealthy "socialists" want is not socialism.  What they want is a form of oligarchy where they are the aristocrats and no one else is allowed to enter their ranks, except through either birth to aristocracy or by power politics in the government.  

As aristocrats, they would retain their wealth and their privileges. Further, they would pass these on to their children in perpetuity.  As aristocrats, their children would have unequaled opportunities to rise to political power, along with all its perks.

In their world, aside from themselves, the government would be the sole vehicle for attaining the perks of wealth and privilege.  No other profession, outside of government, would control the spigots of wealth.  Those spigots would only open for those whom the power-elite and the aristocrats decide is worthy of living an abundant life.

Everyone else will need tighten their belts "for the greater good" and learn to live without.

References
L Maxim Lott, 30 April 2019, Lifestyles of the rich and socialist: American celebs who blast capitalism while making millions, Fox News, https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/lifestyles-of-the-rich-and-socialist-american-celebs-capitalism-millionaires

Ann Schmidt, 21 November 2019, What is Bernie Sanders' net worth?, Fox News, https://www.foxbusiness.com/money/bernie-sanders-net-worth

Anne Sraders, 21 May 2019, What Is Bernie Sanders' Net Worth?, The Street, https://www.thestreet.com/lifestyle/bernie-sanders-net-worth-14678955

Michela Tindera, 20 August 2019, How Elizabeth Warren Built A $12 Million Fortune, Forbes Magazine, https://www.forbes.com/sites/michelatindera/2019/08/20/how-elizabeth-warren-built-a-12-million-fortune/#1eecc607ab57

Taylor Nicole Rogers, 28 June 2019, What George Soros' life is really like: How the former hedge-fund manager built his $8.3 billion fortune, purchased a sprawling network of New York homes, and became the topic of international conspiracy theories, Business Insider, https://www.businessinsider.com/george-soros-net-worth-wife-sons-news-house-career-2019-6



Tom Sheppard is a business consultant and coach to small business owners and individuals. He is a recognized author with dozens of titles in business and fiction to his credit. One of his endeavors is to help those who want to see their own book in print. He does this through his trademarked Book Whispering Process (TM). 
The author is not an official spokesperson for any organization or person mentioned herein. 

(c) Copyright 2019 A+ Results LLC. All Rights Reserved. 

 Your comments are welcome... Please observe some ground rules. No profanity, vulgarity, or personal attacks. Profanity, vulgarity and personal attacks not only betray a lack of vocabulary and imagination, they also are the hallmarks of bigotry, and bigotry is the hallmark of someone who is fundamentally insecure in their views. Facts are always welcome.


Friday, March 22, 2019

Are You Too Selfish for Socialism?

Ocasio Cortez in Action
Tom Sheppard
3/22/2019

There are lots of folks today talking about the wonders of socialism.  OCA and Bernie Sanders are both promising free education and free healthcare.  There seems to be lots of support for their ideas from the so-called Millennials.  But, I am not sure the Millennials, or anyone else, is really selfless enough to live with real-world socialism.

FREE EDUCATION - NO STUDENT DEBT

You won't have to worry about student debt under socialism.  But, it isn't because the education is free.  It is because most people won't be allowed to go to College.  You will take tests along the way from your earliest years.  Based on the tests you will be assigned a job or allowed to further your education in the field that the tests indicate you will succeed at, if the government has need of people with that degree.

If you don't have good enough test scores to convince the government to send you to college, you won't be able to go work in your Uncle's business, because having a business is subversive and illegal.  You won't be able to start your own business either, so you can say goodbye to any dream you might ever had of living a life of abundance.  You will spend the rest of your life leaving the dream of Nietzsche, living a life of quiet desperation.

If you are one of the ones lucky enough to be selected to go to college, you can forget about taking a year off, or even a semester off.  If you don't get good enough grades, you will be removed from college and assigned a job.  Also, you can forget about frat-house parties and college pranks.

Education is a serious government business under socialism.  It is your civic duty to do your best, and to complete your college education as quickly as possible so that you can begin to contribute to the society that paid for your education.

College bacchanals WILL get your thrown out of college.  If you don't end up taking a detour through jail, you will count yourself lucky as you put your dreams of college in the trash and take the job the government assigns you to, even if it is working at a collective farm, picking potatoes in Idaho.

One last point.  As a college student, don't even think about staging a sit-in, or mounting any other kind of protest.  That will get you beaten, thrown out of school, and carted off to a re-education camp in North Dakota, or the Bering Straits of Alaska.  If you survive that, you will never the see the inside of a college again, unless you are assigned to be a janitor there.

Just to recap on the Free Education under socialism:

  1. You won't get to go to college unless your test scores in high school were good enough.
  2. You won't get to stay in college if your grades don't stay good enough.
  3. There won't be any partying at college for you, or anyone else there.
  4. If you are thrown out of college for bad behavior, you WILL go to jail.
  5. If you flunk out of college, you will work at whatever job the government assigns you to, even if it is manual labor on a farm in Idaho.
Of course, you will be happy to accept all these conditions, because you believe everyone shouldn't be selfish, and you want to be a good citizen, doing your civic duty.

Zero Unemployment

If the socialist government hasn't quite progressed to the point where they assign your job (they haven't yet in Denmark), that is simply because the unemployment problem hasn't gotten bad enough yet.  When it does, they will fix unemployment by guaranteeing everyone a "good paying" government job.  You will take the job they assign you, or you be labeled a subversive and you will go to jail and get re-educated to quit your selfish ways, or it will kill you.

Live Rent Free

You won't have to worry about rent payments or house payments under socialism.  You will live in the apartment that a government official decides is appropriate for you.  Most of them will be very much like the public housing projects of the poverty stricken inner cities of the US today.  They will be cold, gray, lifeless buildings designed for their use, not wasting anything on pleasing aesthetics.

No House Payments Either

Forget about needing to save up to buy a house.  You won't get a house.  Ever.  Unless you manage to become one of the very, very top 1/2 of 1% of government officials.  And when you get to that level, you not only have a house, but you can go to stores that are stocked like an average supermarket here in the US.  Below that level, you won't see anything that even vaguely resembles a Kroger, and certainly not a Wal Mart.

No Big Utility Bills

If the USSR (70+ years of socialism in practice) is a good indicator, although the costs for your electricity will be low, you won't want to leave the water running too long in the shower under socialism either.  No long-hot showers.  And make sure to turn off the lights when you leave your apartment.  Because the state is paying the hot water bill, if you use too much that makes you both selfish and a subversive.  And, if they label you a subversive, your life is pretty much over.  First you will go to jail.  When your trial comes up, they will find you guilty and sentence you to spend some time in a re-education camp where they will beat all the selfishness out of you, or you will die as they try it.

You may think I am painting an overly grim picture here.  However, I am actually doing two things.  First, I am carrying the tenets of socialism to their logic ends.  Second, I am looking at what has actually happened in socialist countries.
Read on for a few tidbits from history.
The Soviet Union was supposed to be “a society of true democracy,” but in many ways it was no less repressive than the czarist autocracy that preceded it. 
From The Fall of the Soviet Union, The History Channel

Housing in the USSR

Communist Era Housing in Russia
"Poverty and privation drove people from the countryside, while Soviet official industrialization campaigns encouraged (and sometimes forced) their movement to cities. From the 1920s into the 1950s, a significant number of Soviet families lived in communal apartments, while many lived in worse conditions in barracks or "dormitories" (mass housing for workers). For many families, gaining a room in a communal apartment represented a step up in their housing, especially if they found themselves in the most desirable cities of Moscow or Leningrad. Like Iraida Yakovlevna from "A Room for Her Daughter," many people without housing, especially people from the rural areas, tried to get work as janitors so as to gain a room in the city.
"In the Soviet Union, housing in cities belonged to the government. It was distributed by municipal authorities or by government departments based on an established number of square meters per person. As a rule, tenants had no choice in the housing they were offered. Rent and payment for communal services like water and electricity did not form a significant part of a family's budget. They did not cover the real costs, and were subsidized by the government.

Free Education

"The goal of education policy was to teach the masses how or read and write, and channel talented young people into science and technology. It was oriented more towards meeting the needs of society and the state rather than fostering individual development. Schools were free, compulsory, universal and classless and were used disseminate Communist doctrine as well as educate children. The set of ethics stressed the primacy of the collective over the interests of the individual. Therefore, for both teachers and students, creativity and individualism were discouraged.[Source: Library of Congress, July 1996 *]
"The Soviet system dictated what classes university students would take and decided what jobs they would take after they graduated.

Zero Unemployment

"the right and the duty to work were enshrined in the Constitution of the USSR"
  • There were no unemployment benefits.
  • If you were out of a job for more than four months you were legally labeled a "parasite" and could go to prison.

Millennials and Socialism

Jessica Litras, a self-confessed Millennial, notes five reasons Millennials are considered selfish.  Along the way, she notes a few points which, although not selfish, will definitely get you on the wrong side of a socialist government.  Her five points are:
  1. Glued to their phones - we have adopted the innovative life.
  2. Love social media - we like to promote our lives and our accomplishments.
  3. Spend lots of money - we are more concerned about living in the present than denying ourselves something so we can have a better future.
  4. No rush for marriage or kids - we don't want to share our lives with others or reproduce
  5. Put themselves first  - we make decisions based on whether or not it will make us happy.

Here is the rub.  Each of these things won't play well in a socialist world where every act, every word, every thought, must first be about how does this make things better for everyone else?

The innovative life - Innovation is based on creativity and creativity is based on individuality and the opportunity to explore different ways of looking at things.  Looking at things in an unapproved way in a socialist country is how you get to be unemployed and unemployable, if not in jail.

Promoting yourself and your accomplishments is all about you, the individual.  That is about as anti-socialist as you can get.  There is no place in socialism for the needs, wants, or accomplishments of the individual, unless they are for the good of everyone.

Spending lots of money - good luck with that.  Money, as we know it, doesn't exist in socialism.

No rush for marriage or kids - "we don't want to share..."  That pretty much says it all.  Selfish behaviors are frowned on in socialism.

Will it make us happy? - Socialism is not about your individual happiness.  It is all about the happiness of the collective.  If you make decisions because they make you happy, eventually the socialists will throw you in jail for it.

Litras admits that "It’s made millennials open, outspoken and more comfortable with not only what they to say, but the person that they are."

All of this little jaunt through some historical facts entirely avoids the human costs of implementing socialism.  It doesn't speak to the millions who have died because they were 'too selfish' to live a life dedicated to the common good where even their thoughts and every word had to be unoffensive to the government and its officials.

The bottom line here is this.  The propaganda and misinformation about socialism is that it is all about doing what is good and right.  The reality is that socialism is all about doing and thinking what you are told to do.  No more, and no less.  So individualism, all those things that make you who you are, those things that make you standout, they are not tolerated in socialism.  

The only thing tolerated in socialism is blind obedience to the orders of those above you. 

Is that really what Millennials want?  I don't think so.  But, it is what they are working hard to get.

~

Tom Sheppard is a business consultant and coach to small business owners and individuals. He is a recognized author with dozens of titles in business and fiction to his credit. One of his endeavors is to help those who want to see their own book in print. He does this through his trademarked Book Whispering Process (TM). 

The author is not an official spokesperson for any organization or person mentioned herein. 

(c) Copyright 2019 A+ Results LLC. All Rights Reserved. 

 Your comments are welcome... Please observe some ground rules. No profanity, vulgarity, or personal attacks. Profanity, vulgarity and personal attacks not only betray a lack of vocabulary and imagination, they also are the hallmarks of bigotry, and bigotry is the hallmark of someone who is fundamentally insecure in their views. Facts are always welcome.