Showing posts with label tom sheppard. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tom sheppard. Show all posts

Sunday, March 6, 2022

Objectification 101

Some years ago my youngest daughter got a tattoo.  Expressing my disapproval I told her, "people don't put bumper stickers on Ferraris."  She retorted that the only person in her life who had every objectified her was me, when I compared her to a Ferrari.

She was wrong.  I am reasonably certain that every man and boy who ever wanted to bed her objectified her.  Further, she missed the definition of objectification, and so took offense when none was offered.

Objectification happens when a person is reduced to being considered like an object, without thought for their real self, their intelligence, and their feelings.  When a woman (or a man) is objectified as a sex object they are only considered for how their body can be used to gratify the sexual desires of another person, without regard to the needs, feelings, and intelligence of the person being objectified.

Here is the real lesson in Objectification 101 - you can't objectify an object.  

When I compared my daughter's body to a Ferrari, I was referring to the object that is her body and comparing it to another object. A car body.  I was not saying anything about her intelligence, her needs, or her feelings. I was questioning her judgement in how she was using one of the most important objects in her life.  I was making an analogy that points out the fact that when you have a very expensive and valuable object you don't mark it up with graffiti or stickers.  Our bodies are very expensive and valuable objects, but they are objects after all.

The Apostle Paul said that our bodies are temples for the spirit of God and that if we defile that temple God will destroy us. (1 Corinthians 3:17 & 6:19-20).  So, at least as far back as the first century AD it has been understood that our bodies are objects provided for our use by God, and He will hold us accountable for what we do with them.

The confusion conflating making an analogy about our body and objectification of our self arises because most of us identify ourselves too much with our bodies, rather than looking on our bodies for what they are, a home for our spirit and mind.  While it is true that our spirit, mind, and body are intertwined, our body does not truly represent our self.

A body may, like that of Stephen Hawking, be broken, weak, or twisted.  Or, like Arnold Schwarzenegger's be well formed, agile, and muscular.  But, neither the broken body, nor the well-formed one is a reflection of our mind and spirit.  The body is a temporary home for our mortal probation.

The world does its best to conflate our physical appearance with our self, and our self-worth.  Fashion models are worshipped and esteemed because of their bodies, rather than because of any particular intelligence or goodness they manifest.

When I was a young man Kathy Ireland was a world-famous fashion model.  At the time, her fame and fortune was wholly based on the attractiveness of her body.  Many years later I met Kathy Ireland in person.  When I met her I found that she was someone worthy of admiration.  She is a woman of intelligence, integrity, and ingenuity.  She took the monies she earned from her fashion career and turned them into a business empire which she runs.  She invested her money and her intelligence wisely.  Now that she is far beyond competing with young girls for the lustful attentions of the world, her brilliance, and her goodness are evident in both her deeds and her words.  When I met she expressly warned people about the false doctrine of the "prosperity Gospel" which equates righteousness with financial and physical well-being.

Kathy Ireland and Tom Sheppard


After we resurrect our bodies will be glorified and perfected and then they will reflect our true selves.  Until then, our body is an object, a mobile home, a Ferrari in which we travel through this life.

What is more is it is given to us as a loaner, and the true owner will hold us accountable for what we do with it.  God gives us our body, whether it is bent or straight, sickly or healthy, weak or strong.  He gives us a body out of his wisdom and love according to what he sees we need to help us grow more like Him.  Just as He gives us the circumstances of our life.  

When life is over we will face him again with all the bandages of self-deception ripped away and we will account to Him for what use we made of what He provided us.  

He won't judge us for the objects in our life.  Our physical frailties won't define us.  What we did with what He gave us will define us.  Did we trash it, hide it away, or do our best to use it well and honorably until it was no longer in our grasp?

Most of our world is comprised of objects.  Our bodies are objects.  Our minds, our feelings, our thoughts, our intentions, our imaginations, our will, those are not objects.  Those are the powers inherent in us that we apply to the objects in our life to shape and change the world.   

See Tom's political views on Facebook at: https://www.facebook.com/TomSheppardPoliticalViews/
Follow Tom on Twitter: @ThomasKSheppard

Tom Sheppard is a business consultant and coach to small business owners and individuals. He is a recognized author with dozens of titles in business and fiction to his credit. One of his endeavors is to help those who want to see their own book in print. He does this through his trademarked Book Whispering Process (TM).

The author is not an official spokesperson for any organization or person mentioned herein.

(c) Copyright 2020 A+ Results LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Your comments are welcome... Please observe some ground rules. No profanity, vulgarity, or personal attacks. Profanity, vulgarity and personal attacks not only betray a lack of vocabulary and imagination, they also are the hallmarks of bigotry, and bigotry is the hallmark of someone who is fundamentally insecure in their views. Facts are always welcome.

If you believe Government is NOT the answer to all our problems, you will want to read
 Godvernment: Government as God

Friday, September 10, 2021

Withdrawing from Afghanistan and Nation Building


Burning Warrior Image (C) DepositPhotos.com Used with Permission


Tom Sheppard
9/10/2021

As we consider the chaotic and blame-riddled scene of our withdrawal from Afghanistan it may be worthwhile to consider why we went there in the fist place, and why we stayed nearly 20 years.

This video from PragerU succinctly describes what happened on September 11, 2001 which began the chain of events that led us into fighting in Afghanistan. If you don't want to watch the video, the short version is that more than 3,000 civilians and some military were attacked and killed on that day by terrorists sponsored by Al Queda.  Military intelligence revealed that the head of Al Queada, and their strongest presence was in Afghanistan.

Through diplomatic and other channels the US Government requested that the government of Afghanistan eject Al Queda from their country.  The Taliban was running Afghanistan at the time and they refused to sanction Al Queda in any way.  As a result, we went to war with Al Queda and their ally, the Taliban.

Over the next several weeks and months the US Military succeeded in effectively destroying nearly all offensive military capabilities of the Taliban and killed many in Al Queda.

US leaders, pondering their next steps, decided that the best way to make sure that Afghanistan would never again become a haven for terrorists was to reshape that country into a democratic republic.  They made this decision based on a view of history that reveals that democratic governments rarely initiate wars on other democratic countries.

With that decision, the mission of the US Military changed from pursuing, killing, or capturing Al Queda members and their allies to building the nation of Afghanistan.

It is worth noting that after World World II the US successfully brought on more than a half century of peace in Europe by rebuilding Germany and brought a significant degree of stability to the Far East by converting Japan from a monarchy into a democratic republic.  Likewise, the nation-building efforts in South Korea have resulted in a powerful ally, an economic miracle in Asia, and a strong democratic tradition there.

Of course, our efforts in Vietnam and later in Afghanistan did not result in the same stellar effects as seen in Germany, Japan, and South Korea.  Why not?

From my analysis of these situations it seems clear that the failures in South Vietnam and Afghanistan both have the same root cause - lack of long-term commitment.

Some will laugh at that and say, "Aren't 20 years enough of a commitment?"  The simple answer to that is "No."

A frank analysis of the successful nation building in Germany, Japan, and South Korea reveals several one telling fact.
  • After more than 50 years we still have a military presence in all three of those countries.
In 2021 the US has about 200,000 military personnel in Europe.  We have 28,000 in Korea.  We have 55,000 in Japan.  

According to The Military Times our peak of engagement in Afghanistan we had about 100,000 troops there.

It is worth noting that we have also engaged in nation building in Iraq.  If you recall, we went in there for very different reasons than we did in Afghanistan.  However, once we took Saddam Hussein out of power we helped secure the peace while Iraqis established a democratic government.  However, when we withdrew our military, they were nearly overrun by ISIS.  The collapse of Iraq was only prevented by a significant re-engagement of our military there.  The Iraqis seem to be continuing on a path to building a stable democracy, but it still seems that if we withdrew, they might collapse, just as happened in Afghanistan.

Conclusions

My experience as a project manager and in process improvement has taught me that if you don't fix the root cause of problems, then you are just treating the symptoms.  I refer to this as putting out fires while not stopping the arsonist.  The initial impetus for our engagement in Afghanistan was to put out a fire.  Our objective was changed to getting rid of the arsonist.  However, in a country where arsonists abound and are often in charge of large groups of people, it will literally take a couple of generations (or more) of work to not only stop the arsonists, but to get rid of the tradition of people following arsonists.

I fully believe that we should have taken the actions we did to put out the fire and make life unbearable for those who attacked us on September 11, 2001, or any who would do so again.  However, if we want to get rid of the arsonists, we need to count the cost in advance and be prepared to invest 50 years or more of our blood and treasure to make that happen.  That is the real cost of nation building.


See Tom's political views on Facebook at: https://www.facebook.com/TomSheppardPoliticalViews/
Follow Tom on Twitter: @ThomasKSheppard

Tom Sheppard is a business consultant and coach to small business owners and individuals. He is a recognized author with dozens of titles in business and fiction to his credit. One of his endeavors is to help those who want to see their own book in print. He does this through his trademarked Book Whispering Process (TM).

The author is not an official spokesperson for any organization or person mentioned herein.

(c) Copyright 2021 A+ Results LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Your comments are welcome... Please observe some ground rules. No profanity, vulgarity, or personal attacks. Profanity, vulgarity and personal attacks not only betray a lack of vocabulary and imagination, they also are the hallmarks of bigotry, and bigotry is the hallmark of someone who is fundamentally insecure in their views. Facts are always welcome.

If you believe Government is NOT the answer to all our problems, you will want to read
 Godvernment: Government as God

Friday, September 4, 2020

Civil Society Rests on the 10 Commandments

Image (c) talitha and Depositphotos.com

This article is an excerpt from Godvernment: Government as God

Tom Sheppard

9/4/2020

While many today are clamoring for the exile of religion from the public square and taking down the Ten Commandments from our courthouses, they do so without thought or understanding of how the Ten Commandments are perfectly designed to allow us to enjoy the fruits of a civil society.

        The Ten Commandments give us a glimpse into the stupid and awful things people can do.  I have taken the liberty of rephrasing them below, along with some elaboration of what these say about human nature.

1.       Worship only God.  When you put your faith in anything other than God, you will be let down.  [for more on this topic see Faith in Who or What]

2.       Don’t worship the work of your own hands.  When you devote all your time, energy, and passion to the acquisition of material things, you are worshipping the work of your own hands.  You are behaving as though your happiness and long-term well-being is dependent on, and attainable through, your things.

3.       Don’t refer to God rashly or foolishly.  People who are smart or know a lot frequently get an inflated opinion of themselves.  They begin to think that they are smarter than God, and certainly smarter than people who believe in God.  This leads to a casual dismissal of wisdom which has helped build and preserve civil societies throughout history.

4.       Remember the Sabbath day and keep it holy.  Take one day in a week, and set it aside to do God’s work. 

Being actively engaged in a noble work that is greater than yourself gives your own life perspective and makes you more grateful for the abundance you enjoy.

5.       Show respect to your parents.  Many people today disregard the wisdom that has been earned by those who have come before us.  First in deserving respect are our parents.  Instead, people succumb to another tenet of the Communist Manifesto and allow themselves to be separated from and despise the teachings of their parents. 

Divorcing yourself from the wisdom of your antecedents, you make yourself easy prey to slick arguments which sound good and seem to make sense, but which cannot stand the test of time—a fact known to your parents, who have already stood the test of time.

6.       Don’t murder.  There is much ado today about “Black Lives Matter.”  Some are willing to justify killing police officers because they feel that the killing of someone who is a threat to their fellow human beings is somehow unjustified because he is someone’s son and his skin color is black. 

God’s laws are colorblind.  He commands that we have a healthy respect for all human life and that we only take it when absolutely necessary. 

Valuing the life of our neighbor creates a society that is nurturing, caring, safe, and protective of its members. 

When murder runs rampant in the streets, unchecked by the enforcement of laws, all men and women must look to the strength of their own arm to protect their own life and the lives of those they love.  Civil society disintegrates into chaos and barbarism when basic respect for human life doesn’t restrain the behavior of people.

7.       Don’t commit adultery.  There are at least two points in this commandment.  Adultery is when a married person has sexual relations with someone who is not his or her lawful spouse. 

When adultery happens, at least one person has become a liar, violating the solemn oaths he or she has sworn to forsake all others, to love and cherish. 

The second point is that an attack on the institution of marriage is an attack on the basic building block of civil society.  If the most intimate family relationship is not safe from predation, then a higher level of civilization is unsustainable.  Eventually, every family that wants to maintain its integrity will feel the need to separate from society at large and keep its activities close to home. 

The third point of this commandment is related to the first.  It is trust.  Mutual trust is utterly essential for any relationship—marital, societal, or fraternal—to function effectively.  A military unit functions effectively when each member knows that all other members of the team will do their part.  That is universally true for any society to function. 

Without trust, no group of two or more people can cooperate to achieve things that are beyond the capability of the lone individual.

8.       Don’t steal.  Where the commandment against adultery is meant to allow a civil society to function because of security and trust within the family, the injunction against taking what you have not earned is designed to allow people to work together without the need to constantly watch over their belongings and food. 

When theft runs rampant, the faithful provider has no choice other than to take every effort to secure his or her food and other possessions.  At an extreme, the individual cannot participate in civil society because she or he is too busy protecting what has been obtained through their industry.

9.       Don’t lie.  As mentioned above, when discussing one of the corrosive effects of adultery, lying or deceit renders an individual untrustworthy. 

Untrustworthy people cannot build a civil society.  That is not to say that they cannot build a society, but it will not be a civil society, and civil society provides the opportunities for the higher expressions of human beauty, such as the arts and literature.

10.   Do not covet your neighbor’s wife, house, servants, animals, or anything else.  Lusting after the abundance of another has the effect of making you ignore the abundance in your own life. 

Coveting is a gateway anti-social behavior.  All too often, envying what someone else has leads to trying to find ways to take from the neighbor for yourself.  To do that, you end up lying, stealing, committing adultery by seducing the neighbor’s spouse, or perhaps even killing your neighbor to get what they have.  And, just in case you missed it, when all that bad behavior becomes known, that brings shame to your parents.

Today is Worse Than Days Gone By

God knows his children.  He knows both the good and the bad that they are capable of.  He also knows that in our days, people will be much worse than in former times.  Nearly 2,000 years ago, he showed his Apostle Paul our day and commanded him to write of it, so that we would be forewarned and have a witness of the wisdom and foreknowledge of God.

This know also, that in the last days, perilous times shall come.

For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, traitors, heady, high minded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.

For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts, ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. 
Now as Jannes and Jambres[i] withstood Moses, so do these also resist the truth: men of corrupt minds, reprobate concerning the faith. 

2 Timothy 3:1-8

       I believe that any honest assessment of our society today will demonstrate that all these bad behaviors are not only extant today, but are actually celebrated in many parts of our society.  When I say celebrated, I mean that instead of being decried as bad behaviors, they are held up as evidence of being modern and enlightened.

Traitors, for instance.  Most people would say being a traitor is a bad thing, yet many will praise the likes of Edward Snowden as being a noble man of conscience for stealing secrets from the National Security Agency and delivering them both to the press and to the enemies of the United States.  Yet, regardless of opinion, there can be no debate regarding the fact that to do what he did required him to break the oaths of secrecy which he swore.

Incontinent is another thing.  Today, we hear ads for Depends and think of incontinence as having something to do with not having control over your bowels.  However, incontinence actually means “lacking self-control.”  Paul, in his letter to Timothy, was talking about how people would come to celebrate their lack of self-restraint.

And that last verse about Jannes and Jambre?  Paul was referring to the court magicians of Pharoah who did their own imitations of the signs Moses gave Pharoah and convinced him not to let the Israelites go, in spite of all the plagues that came.

Our Poor are Rich

Today, we are awash in people who are ungrateful for the abundance they enjoy.  You don’t believe me?  Consider this, the average “poor” person in the U.S. today lives indoors in a regularly constructed building.  They have electricity, indoor plumbing, television, cell phones, a fridge, a stove, perhaps even a car or two, some kind of stereo, and ready access to food and clothing. 

In contrast, the poor I worked with in Ecuador lived in cane shacks built on stilts over top of open sewers.  Their water was either delivered into a barrel in front of the house or caught from the rain.  And when it rained, most folks went out into the street and used the opportunity to get a rare shower.  They had no electricity.  The one house in the neighborhood that had electricity and a fridge used the fridge as a small business, selling cold drinks and frozen treats.  Stoves were run from small propane tanks.  In short, they lived every day slightly less well off than most of us do when we go camping.

Having seen real poverty, where children go swimming in open sewers, have no shirts or shoes, and no healthcare, I find myself shaking my head in disbelief when I see and hear the “poor” in the U.S. complaining, because, while they live like the upper middle class of most third-world countries, they don’t have all of the creature comforts that others enjoy.

Their answer to this disparity is to covet what others have and advocate that the government steal from others on their behalf.  Or, they justify criminal activities to rob and steal directly to get the material things which others have earned by their own hard work and industry.

Paul, in his letter to Timothy, left out the usual bad behaviors that have prevailed throughout history—those that the Ten Commandments were designed to counter.

Our Good Nature

The evil that men do lives after them; the good is oft interred with their bones.

William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar

After reading the last segment, you are probably convinced that I have a pretty low opinion of people.  Perhaps you believe, as some religions preach, that we are basically evil people when we come into this world.  Nothing could be further from the truth.  I believe that people come into this world with a disposition to be good. 

Unfortunately, for all of us, the pleasures and distresses of the flesh are powerful intoxicants, and they too often divert us from our good intentions.  Thus the verity of the aphorism, “the spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak.”

Genuinely good people are capable of such incredibly selfless acts and kindness as to be breathtaking.

When I think of the good nature of people, I think of the firefighters who went into the twin towers in New York on September 11, 2001, and those who go into burning buildings every day.  They put their lives at risk to save the lives and property of others.

Likewise, I think of the men and women who are ordinary police officers.  Every day, they put their lives at risk so that the rest of us can live without the fear of falling prey to violent people who are gleefully embracing the worst behaviors they can exhibit.

Mother Teresa is recognized the world over for her decades-long, selfless work to physically and spiritually administer salvation to impoverished orphans in Calcutta, India.

A survey by sociologist James Davison Hunter testifies to the underlying moral consensus that still exists in America. Hunter's survey found that 97 percent of Americans agree with the statement that "with hard work and perseverance, anyone can succeed in America."  Ninety-six percent agree that "American democracy is only as strong as the virtue of its citizens."  Ninety-three percent agree that "America's contribution is one of expanding freedom for more and more people."

Nearly every major religion in the world is built on a foundation of trying to encourage people to cultivate their better natures.  I believe that Jesus of Nazareth put it best when he encapsulated good behavior in what has become known as The Golden Rule: “Love your neighbor as yourself.”

When we treat others with the respect, kindness, attentiveness, compassion, and care that we would like to receive in return, we establish the firmest foundation for a civil society.

Becoming a Good Person

Good people—truly good people—are those who not only behave well, but really don’t even want to behave badly.

They don’t lust after their neighbor’s goods.  They don’t lie.  They don’t steal.  They don’t murder.  They don’t commit adultery.  They are respectful of their parents and the wisdom of their antecedents.  They are actively engaged in a good and noble cause that is greater than themselves.

They do all these things because, although they can behave badly, they don’t enjoy behaving badly and they relish the fruits of good behavior.

In the interest of being honest, I confess that I am not a consistently, truly good person.  If anyone goes looking for bad behaviors in my life, they will find them.  However, I need to confess a couple of more things on this point.

I am closer to consistently being a truly good person now than I have ever been before.  I believe that I can continue to improve and become, more consistently, a truly good person.  The atoning sacrifice of Jesus Christ makes it possible for me to put my bad behaviors behind me and make real progress toward becoming the kind of person God wants me to be.

The effort to become a good person is not trivial, and it doesn’t have a really firm finish line in this life.  It is, in fact, more of a process than a destination.

The first step toward becoming a good person is to have the desire to be a good person.

The second step is to immediately begin to act like a good person.

The third step is to immediately begin to think and talk like a truly good person.

Many of us have heard the advice, “fake it until you make it.”  When it comes to becoming a good person, this is better phrased as “behave the way you should until you begin to enjoy behaving the way you should.”

When you reach the stage where you no longer enjoy bad behaviors and you truly enjoy a life filled with good behavior, you have become a truly good person.

I look forward to the day when I am changed completely into a truly good person and I have no more desire or disposition to behave badly.

For those of you who think that living among a lot of truly good people would be boring, I am here to tell you that there are a lot of interesting and fun things to do that don’t involve damaging myself or others in any way.  However, it is really easy to indulge in bad behavior for your “fun.”  Remember the aphorism, “That which we attain too easily, we esteem too lightly,” or in other words, nothing worth having (or becoming) is going to be easy.

Becoming a Good Society

        A truly good society is nothing more or less than a society that is peopled by truly good individuals.

In a truly good society, individuals have freedom of conscience and they are secure in their property and their person.

This freedom of conscience means that they can act according to their own beliefs as long as their actions do not persecute others for their beliefs or threaten the person or property of others.

Being secure in their person means that the society is one where violence against individuals does not exist.  No one has to fear death at the hands of a fellow citizen.

Being secure in their property means that people are able to live without fear that others will arbitrarily or unjustly take their property or deny them use and enjoyment of their own property.

To put it in terms of the Founding Fathers, we are endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable rights.  Among these are the rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

When it comes to a prescription for how we can become a good society, the primary difference between Christianity and collectivism is this:

Christianity seeks to make a good society by establishing just laws to protect freedom of conscience and property rights and encouraging individuals to willingly, individually decide to do their best to submit themselves to the will of God.

Please note here that submission to the will of God and submission to the will of a cleric are not the same things.  This unfortunate fact is all too often the reason why religions have been agitators of significant human misery and warfare.

All too often, organized religion is quickly converted from a noble mission of helping people to create a community of individuals striving to support each other in their efforts to understand and live the will of God into a vehicle for the personal aggrandizement and wealth of the clergy, collectively and individually.

In contrast with the voluntary submission that God seeks from us, collectivism and Godvernment really doesn’t care whether our submission is forced or not.  It attempts to legislate, bully, and forcibly compel every individual to adopt a submissive attitude toward government, accepting the bureaucracy as the final arbiter of who is a good person and who is not. 

Once Godvernment gains the absolute power it needs to survive, its agents will begin their programs to exterminate “bad” people so that they can create a good society. 

In a world where government replaces God as our savior, bad people are those who don’t wholeheartedly support every mandate handed down by our government.  And bad people, with their failure to energetically get on board with the dictates of government, are a danger to society.

The U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights established a structure where the government was limited to establishing an environment where people would be able to have freedom of conscience while being secure in both their persons and property.

Today, many people are actively seeking to negate the U.S. Constitution, in whole or in part, in order to establish a government that is both the sole object of our devotion and the only arbiter of what rights we will be allowed to enjoy.

This anti-constitutional effort is the greatest threat to the happiness of the people of the U.S. and the world.  If it is successful, it will mean that the rule of law and the chance for a truly good society will be utterly beyond the reach of generations to come, until the Godvernment is removed from its throne and constitutional government is once again the law of the land.



[i] Just in case you don’t get the reference to Jannes and Jambres, I looked them up.  It seems they are the magicians of Pharoah who, when Moses invoked the plagues on Egypt, did their own parlor tricks to convince Pharoah that God was not really backing Moses.  They succeeded so well in blinding the mind of Pharoah to the reality that was before him, that he resisted God until all the firstborn of Egypt died in a single night. 

I am going to go out on a limb and speculate that they had a hand in convincing him later to take his army in pursuit of the Israelites, an effort which led to the utter destruction of Pharoah’s army.


Food for thought!

See Tom's political views on Facebook at: https://www.facebook.com/TomSheppardPoliticalViews/ 
Follow Tom on Twitter: @ThomasKSheppard 

Tom Sheppard is a business consultant and coach to small business owners and individuals. He is a recognized author with dozens of titles in business and fiction to his credit. One of his endeavors is to help those who want to see their own book in print. He does this through his trademarked Book Whispering Process (TM). 

The author is not an official spokesperson for any organization or person mentioned herein. 

(c) Copyright 2020 A+ Results LLC. All Rights Reserved. 

Your comments are welcome. Please observe some ground rules. No profanity, vulgarity, or personal attacks. Profanity, vulgarity and personal attacks not only betray a lack of vocabulary and imagination, they also are the hallmarks of bigotry, and bigotry is the hallmark of someone who is fundamentally insecure in their views. Facts are always welcome.

If you believe Government is NOT the answer to all our problems, you will want to read
 Godvernment: Government as God
Click on the image below to buy your copy today

Godvernment is available in both paperback and ebook format through Amazon.

Saturday, February 8, 2020

Electing Parents

Photo (c) Rafael Ben-Ari/Chameleons Eye / Depositphotos.com
Tom Sheppard
2/8/2020

Our political elites, both Democratic and Republican, seem to be under the mistaken impression that we voted them to be our elected parents.  Putting them in office because we lack the good sense and judgement to manage our money and other affairs wisely and in our own best interests.

Along those same lines, they seem to assume that being elected officials and political elites automatically makes them somehow smarter than all other citizens.

This sense of being above the rest of us, at least with Congress, is reinforced by their passing laws from which they are exempt.

For instance, the much debated minimum wage requirements don't apply to Congress.  The minimum wage and other mandated employee workplace rights are covered in The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).  Congress made themselves exempt from the FLSA.  So, they don't have to pay minimum wage or worry about whether or not an employee is exempt or not exempt from the FLSA, because they made all Congressional employees exempt from the act, regardless of how little they may be paid.

Why is Congress exempt from the FLSA?  Perhaps they felt that being who they are, they would always do the right things by their employees and so, such regulation was unnecessary for them, but just, fair, and right to impose on everyone else.

Don't get me wrong. I am not opposed to the FLSA.  I am opposed to Congress making laws from which they exempt themselves.  If it is good for the rest of the country, then it is good for Congress.  If it is bad for Congress, then it is bad for the rest of the country.  There is no magical dome surrounding the Capitol which causes the laws to behave differently there than elsewhere - except the one erected by Congress.

Another of those regulations that are good for the country, but bad for Congress is the Occupational Safety and Hazards Act (OSHA).  OSHA has subjected countless businesses across the country to inspections and remediation costs, not based on any complaints or accidents, but solely because an OSHA inspector decided to walk into an establishment and assert his or her authority under this act.  But our Congress isn't subject to OSHA, so they will never suffer an unwarranted inspection, fines, and mandatory remediation of workplace safety hazards no matter how many people get hurt in the halls of the Capitol because OSHA might result in frivolous lawsuits against Congress.  Once again, those frivolous suits won't happen to business, only to Congress, so Congress must be exempt from OSHA.  Of course that it utter nonsense.  Laws that are bad for Congress is bad for the country, and laws that are good for the country is good for Congress.

Congress too is exempt from the Affordable Health Care Act (also known as ObamaCare).  Many on Capitol Hill continue to sing the praises of how wonderful this program is for America while they made themselves exempt from the provisions of the act that would have taxed their own "Cadillac Health Care Plan" which they enjoy.

To add insult to injury, Congress is exempt from Social Security.  They don't have to pay Social Security taxes.  And, their retirement plan is to die for.  If you get elected to just two terms as a Representative or just one term as a Senator, and then you retire, you get full pay for life.  With as little as four years or six years on the job our Congress gets to retire at full pay for the rest of their lives.  And they each get six-figure salaries.

Again, don't get me wrong here.  I am not opposed to our Congress getting paid six-figure salaries.  Getting the job requires that they maintain a household in their home state and one in the Washington, DC area.  That is not cheap.  What I object to is them having any retirement plan other than Social Security and an ordinary 401K, like the rest of us can get after working four to six years.

Most corporate retirement plans won't pay you anything if you only work for a company four to six years.

I believe one of the best ways to return our elected officials back into public servants is to deny them any retirement program outside of what is available to ordinary citizens, in other words, Social Security, a 401K, and an IRA.

Some might say, but what about those guys and gals who labor 20 years or more in DC for us?  I say, what about them?  They shouldn't be living off the public for that much time, and when they quit, they should be on their own.  There should be no other retirement plan for elected officials except Social Security and any private investments they make in their 401K or IRA accounts.  Once they leave office, they should no longer be fed at taxpayer expense.

All of these self-directed exemptions from the laws that govern ordinary citizens has the natural effect of making them believe they are an elite for whom the laws don't apply, because they have made that into a self-fulfilling prophecy.  Strip them of the ability to make themselves exempt from the laws they write and they will be in the same regulatory boat as the rest of us.  Strip them of their amazing health plan and make them buy one in the open market.  Strip them of a fat-cat retirement program and make them both pay into Social Security and have to live by what they get from that instead of giving them taxpayer money for life.

If we do that, perhaps we will come a little closer to helping them understand they are us.  They aren't better, smarter, or wiser than us.  We elected them to represent us, not to rule over us.

We elect representatives, not rulers, or parents.


Tom Sheppard is a business consultant and coach to small business owners and individuals. He is a recognized author with dozens of titles in business and fiction to his credit. One of his endeavors is to help those who want to see their own book in print. He does this through his trademarked Book Whispering Process (TM). 

 The author is not an official spokesperson for any organization or person mentioned herein. 

(c) Copyright 2020 A+ Results LLC. All Rights Reserved. 

 Your comments are welcome... Please observe some ground rules. No profanity, vulgarity, or personal attacks. Profanity, vulgarity and personal attacks not only betray a lack of vocabulary and imagination, they also are the hallmarks of bigotry, and bigotry is the hallmark of someone who is fundamentally insecure in their views. Facts are always welcome.

If you believe that Government is NOT the answer to all our problems, thenyou will want to read Godvernment: Government as God



Monday, July 22, 2019

Moving Toward the Future While Enjoying the Present

Tom Sheppard
7/22/2019

A few years ago my wife and I were in the process of moving out of our home of 23+ years.  The process was very wrenching for several reasons.

The last two of our five children were born while we lived in this house and all five of our children had come to adulthood while we lived here.  So, the home itself had a great amount of our hearts and lives invested in its very walls.   The fact that our move was more or less being forced on us made the whole issue of leaving the house painful in itself.  Also, moving meant getting rid of lots of accumulated "stuff."  Much of that stuff was accumulated based not on monetary value but on sentimental value.  Every parent knows what I am talking about.  The pictures your children brought home which you hung on the fridge, etc.

In the midst of all the chaos of packing boxes, loading a moving truck, and emptying the house we came upon a box with this picture laminated and taped to the top of the box.  At the time it struck me as a sort of message from God, so I took a picture of it and shared it with my wife. 

I admit, amid the pain of the move it was cold comfort.  Still, it did help me to push aside my own emotional upheaval and focus on what might be on the horizon, even if at the time the view ahead was a bit murky.

From this experience I learned to not put so much of myself into "stuff."  The things we accumulate break, tear, wear out, and are eventually discarded.  However, the things we do can remain alive in the hearts and minds of ourselves and those whose lives we touch.

Now, to me it seems like surrounding myself with a lot of stuff seems a lot like living in the past instead of looking toward the future.  If we don't turn and face the future, it is going to smack us hard on the back of the head, because it will arrive whether or not we are facing it.  I have found I would rather be looking ahead so that I can manage things coming at me much better than when I am living in the past, or looking to the past.

Don't get me wrong, I think we all need to examine our history (personal and otherwise) to learn from mistakes (and successes).  And, we need to take those lessons learned and look at what is coming toward us and happening around us and see if we can use them to help us succeed amid all the noise and chaos of the present and the visible future.  The problem comes when we stand there looking only backwards.  Too often we are staring back at failures we experienced, and they are keeping us from succeeding in the future.  Likewise, we may be staring back at our "glory days" believing that the best of us is now in the past.  Being fixated on past successes is almost as deadly as being fixated on past failures.

Learn from the past, don't try to dwell there.  On the other hand, facing the future doesn't mean trying to dwell on it either.  What we see on the horizon may never end up at our feet.  This may be because it turns aside, we turn aside, or we die before that coming wave reaches us.  Instead of dwelling in the past, or fixating on the future we must live in the present and apply all our cunning, knowledge, and energy to making today as wonderful, valuable, and lively as it can be. 

Tom Sheppard is a business consultant and coach to small business owners and individuals. He is a recognized author with dozens of titles in business and fiction to his credit. One of his endeavors is to help those who want to see their own book in print. He does this through his trademarked Book Whispering Process (TM). 

 The author is not an official spokesperson for any organization or person mentioned herein. 

 (c) Copyright 2019 A+ Results LLC. All Rights Reserved. 

Your comments are welcome... Please observe some ground rules. No profanity, vulgarity, or personal attacks. Profanity, vulgarity and personal attacks not only betray a lack of vocabulary and imagination, they also are the hallmarks of bigotry, and bigotry is the hallmark of someone who is fundamentally insecure in their views. Facts are always welcome.

Wednesday, August 23, 2017

Colliding Warships: Tom Clancy and Tom Sheppard

authors tom sheppard and tom clancy

Tom Sheppard
8/23/2017

Tom Clancy had a vivid imagination.  I read and enjoyed his books.  He often wove intricate plots which involved governments or quasi-governments engaging in elaborate schemes to hide their hands in world events until they were ready to make their dramatic, public moves.

To be very blunt, recent headlines from the Pacific read like plot points in a Tom Clancy novel.

In the past year, we have had dramatically escalating conflicts with both China and North Korea.  At the same time, the US Seventh Fleet, our primary military force in that part of the world has experienced an unprecedented series of four mishaps with our warships in that part of the world.

Most recently, the USS John McCain was hit by an oil tanker bearing a Liberian flag.  Before that the USS Fitzgerald collided with a container shipped bearing a Phillipine flag.  In May the USS Champlain collided with a South Korean fishing boat.  In January, the USS Antietam ran aground, hitting an uncharted sandbar outside of Yokosuka Harbor, Japan.

What all of these accidents have in common is that they all involved guided missile ships of the US Navy.  The sort of ships that could effectively do two things, very well:

  1. They could shoot down the missiles coming out of North Korea
  2. They can project force to deter China's aggressive moves to lay claim to all of the South China Sea.
While the failure on the Antietam is probably nothing more or less than a fluke or a failure of the captain or crew, the other three incidents all leave everyone who is aware of the training and capabilities of these ships wondering how this could happen?

The saber rattling of North Korean President Kim Jong Un has been very much in the national and international headlines because of the dramatic nature of his threats.  Test launching missiles capable of reaching the US and working to mount nuclear warheads on them is no idle threat which can be ignored.  One of the countermeasures the US has deployed is to visibly sail our guided missile ships off the coast of Korea as a clear threat to shoot down whatever the North Koreans put into the air.  And the threat from these ships is no fiction.

With the ability to launch multiple supersonic, guided missiles in seconds, as well as putting nuclear capable cruise missiles into the air, the destructive power of just one of these ships is considerable.  North Korea is right to feel intimidated by them.

The actions of the Chinese, because they are less dramatic, have not received nearly as much attention as those of the North Koreans.  But the danger they represent is more probable than a nuclear launch from North Korea.

For years now, the Chinese have been laying claim to atolls and sandbars in the far reaches of the South China Sea.  They have been building up these tiny islands into places capable of hosting airfields while they have also been mounting shore defenses on them.  Along with each claim they stake, they have been claiming that nearly all the waters of the South China Sea are owned by China.

The dashed red line on the map below shows how far China is trying to extend their reach.  This is a lot farther than the 12-mile limit recognized in international maritime law.  It would effectively make the South China Sea into a Chinese lake.  Much as the Roman's referred to the Mediterranean as the Mar Nostrum, "our sea", the Chinese would be able to refer to the South China Sea as their sea.



Countries much closer to these atolls have protested and made counterclaims.  But what do the Chinese really have to fear from the Philippines or Vietnam?  If either or both of those countries tried to go to war with China over these conflicting claims on the atolls, China would destroy them economically and militarily in a matter of weeks.

Only Japan and US have sufficient presence and power to counter the Chinese ambitions in this area.

So why should we care about what is happening in the South China Sea?  Because, experts estimate that about 1/3rd of all global shipping transits the South China Sea.  It is among the busiest shipping lanes in the world.  If China were to succeed in laying claim to its waters, they could control or prohibit trade through those waters.  This would either drive up the costs of everything, by forcing longer routes around those waters, or put a stranglehold on 42% of  goods going in and out of Japan.

The chart below shows clearly that it is not just Japan that would feel the impact.  Germany, France, the UK, Italy, India, Brazil, Canada and the US would all feel significant impacts if the flow of trade through the South China Sea were restricted or taxed by the Chinese.



All of this brings me back to the intricate plots of Tom Clancy.  In one of his novels, he imagined someone high-jacking a passenger jet and using it as a weapon, crashing it into the US Capitol Building.  Then on 9-11 four passenger jets were high-jacked and used as weapons, crashing them into the World Trade Center towers and the Pentagon.  My point here is that whatever an author can imagine in the way of plots and intrigues can also be imagined and implemented by the agents of malice in the world.

To me, when I look at the news coming out of that part of the world, I see signs of a well crafted and cleverly executed plot to dramatically decrease the ability of the US to project power in that part of the world during a very critical time.  Don't be surprised if we see significant escalation in the aggressive moves coming out of China, North Korea or both during the next few months.

Given that North Korea is effectively China's guard dog, it is not at all beyond belief that they are encouraging Kim Jong Un to launch his missiles and taunt the US simply to distract attention away from the more strategic moves China is making a little further south.

Add to this a bit of additional history, from just a bit further back.  When we lost Vietnam, we lost the military use of the deep water port of Cam Rahn Bay, on the West side of the South China Sea.  When the Philippines booted the US out of Subic Bay we lost the military use of a deep water port on the East side of the South China Sea.  Deep water ports are not all that common and they are necessary for the large vessels of the US Navy to dock.  The loss of these two ports means that big US warships, like air craft carriers, would have to come from the ports of Japan or Australia to enforce international law in the South China Sea.  The further we have to stretch to reach the area of contention, the more vulnerable and weaker we are militarily.

If the US is unable to effectively project significant power in the South China Sea, international law won't matter.  China will use its own Navy and its string of air strips, with accompanying military planes, to enforce its control of the area.  If they can set it up, then the only viable alternatives will be to submit to Chinese extortion or for the US to use gunboat diplomacy to force the opening of the shipping lanes.  Getting in a shooting match with China, on their doorstep does not guarantee a positive outcome for the US or the freedom of shipping in international waters.

If an author like Tom Clancy, or me, can imagine it, then the folks in the halls of power have probably already figured out how to make it happen.  Think about that, the next time one of our ships in the Seventh Fleet gets clipped.  The "accident" probably isn't an accident at all.

Some links to related news stories:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-navy-to-relieve-admiral-of-command-after-collisions-1503448987
http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/01/politics/uss-antietam-damaged-japan/index.html
https://www.maritime-executive.com/article/us-navy-releases-initial-report-on-fitzgerald-collision
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/22/world/asia/us-navy-ship-collision-uss-mccain-search-sailors.html
http://www.newsweek.com/china-south-china-sea-islands-build-military-territory-expand-575161
https://chinapower.csis.org/much-trade-transits-south-china-sea/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cam_Ranh_Bay
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Naval_Base_Subic_Bay
Tom Clancy's Executive Orders

Tom Sheppard is a business consultant and coach to small business owners and individuals. He is a recognized author with dozens of titles in business and fiction to his credit. One of his endeavors is to help those who want to see their own book in print. He does this through his trademarked Book Whispering Process (TM). The author is not an official spokesperson for any organization or person mentioned herein. 

(c) Copyright 2017 A+ Results LLC. All Rights Reserved. 

Your comments are welcome... Please observe some ground rules. No profanity, vulgarity, or personal attacks. Profanity, vulgarity and personal attacks not only betray a lack of vocabulary and imagination, they also are the hallmarks of bigotry, and bigotry is the hallmark of someone who is fundamentally insecure in their views. Facts are always welcome.

Learn more about Tom Sheppard at his Amazon Author Page:


http://amzn.to/2vERMnU
Get your own copy of Tom's blockbuster Godvernment today.

Monday, October 31, 2016

Godvernment is Here

Godvernment available now
Tom Sheppard
10/31/2016

Humanity in general and the people of the US and Western Europe in particular have been steadily replacing their faith in God with faith in Government.  This worship of government I call Godvernment.

I believe I first coined the phrase in a post about a year ago when I rolled out this blog.  Since then, several sites have sprung up under the heading of Godvernment.  Feel free to take a moment to fire up Google and check it out.  Or just use this link... HTTPS://www.Google.com/#q=Godvernment 

It only gets about 4,100 hits so far, but I expect that to grow over time.  There is even a YouTube channel and a Facebook page.  Neither of which are mine.

What is mine is a new book I have just published for you.  It is called Godvernment: Government as God.  It is available in both paperback and as an ebook through Kindle (by the way, you don't have to own a Kindle to read it.  You can download the app to nearly any computer and read Kindle books that way).

I wrote the book and I will warn you that it will probably offend almost everyone.  Why?  Because there is plenty of blame to go around for the situation we find ourselves in today.

Christians behaving in very unchristian ways helped move hearts and minds away from Christianity as a credible source for helping humanity to become better, as well as some Christians who have been seduced by the high-sounding moral arguments of socialism.

Socialists and communists, ever since Karl Marx penned The Communist Manifesto, have been trying to first marginalize and then exterminate religion.  Marx and his successors all recognize that religion and capitalism are the only real competition they face.  And, if they can push religion aside, then capitalism, bereft of the brakes imposed by a vibrant Christian ethic becomes the predatory form of capitalism most susceptible to the violent overthrow that Marx envisioned. 

Progressives (socialists with a different name) are seeking to save humanity from its worst excesses though a two-pronged approach: 1) destroy predatory capitalism with government regulations and control and 2) marshal the resources of government to try and engineer a better human being.

While they may succeed on the first point, they can never succeed in the second, because humanity, being fundamentally flawed, cannot create a perfect human being to succeed it.  And if they do manage to create a human that is fundamentally superior to Homo sapiens in any significant way, they will precipitate a war of survival and extinction between Homo sapiens and homo superioris.

I you want to find the real Godvernment site and the real story on Godvernment, go to www.Godvernment.US, or read my book, available in both paperback and ebook.



Your comments are welcome... Please observe some ground rules. No profanity, vulgarity, or personal attacks. Profanity, vulgarity and personal attacks not only betray a lack of vocabulary and imagination, they also are the hallmarks of bigotry, and bigotry is the hallmark of someone who is fundamentally insecure in their views. Facts are always welcome.

The author is not an official spokesperson for any organization or person mentioned herein. 


(c) Copyright 2016 A+ Results LLC. All Rights Reserved. 


Friday, October 7, 2016

Divorced Devotion

Tom Sheppard
10/7/2016

Tim Kaine and Mike Pence both claim to be devout Christians.  

Both were brought up Catholic.

Tim Kaine says, “he wouldn’t allow his religious beliefs to interfere” when it comes to his politics. “I try to practice my religion in a very devout way and follow the teachings of my church in my own personal life. But…”  

Do you know what “but” means?  It means that everything that was said before the word “but” is negated by what comes after.

Mike Pence says, “…my Christian faith became real for me when I made a personal decision for Christ when I was a freshman in college. And I've tried to live that out however imperfectly every day of my life since. … for me, my faith informs my life.”

I didn’t make this up, I took them from a report of the debate in the LA Times (http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-vp-debate-transcript-kaine-pence-20161004-snap-htmlstory.html).

I went to the dictionary (dictionary.com) to look up the word “devout.”  Here is what I found.
1. devoted to divine worship or service; pious; religious:
2. expressing devotion or piety:
3. earnest or sincere; hearty:

The question I have for you is how can a person claim to be devout, and then divorce your behaviors and politics from your religion?

I guess under definition #2 both men could qualify, since expressing devotion or piety meets the definition of being devout.  However, for most people simply expressing piety while actually behaving in an impious manner qualifies as hypocrisy.  So, let’s eliminate that as a workable definition here.

Earnest or sincere, definition #3 is a good working definition.  We all hope both men are earnest and sincere.  The alternative that one or both men are insincere is not something we want to consider in candidates for the second highest position in the most powerful country in the world.  But, the context for these quotes was their belief in god, not their sincerity.

That leaves us with both candidates describing themselves as devoted to divine worship, pious, or religious. In this case, since both are self-proclaimed Christians, that means they were both painting themselves as being devoted to Christ.

Mr. Pence on the one hand allows his faith to inform his life.  Implicitly this means all aspects of his life, including his politics.  On the other hand, Mr. Kaine keeps his devotion divorced from his politics.

I believe it is this divorced devotion that is at the heart of what is ailing our nation, and our politics.
The notion that you can be one person in private and another person in public is one of the biggest lies anyone has ever swallowed.  The Bible says that no one can serve two masters.  Either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will love the one and hate the other. Trying to live your life with two personas, each with their own distinct and widely divergent guiding principles is not only a recipe for multiple personality disorder, it is also the very foundation of the notion of being hypocritical.

In case you missed it, here is the definition of a hypocrite:
1.  a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he or she does not actually possess, especially a person whose actions belie stated beliefs.
2.  a person who feigns some desirable or publicly approved attitude, especially one whose private life, opinions, or statements belie his or her public statements.

So, if Tim Kaine is privately devout and publicly debauched, he is a hypocrite.  If he privately values the sanctity of human life and publicly supports practices like partial birth abortion, then he is a hypocrite.  Which also means that he is not devout under any but one of the definitions above.  I give you a hint which one – he isn’t sincere or earnest and he isn’t devoted to Christ.  He merely expresses piety and devotion – it doesn’t inform his public life.

And this is the heart of the malaise in our country.  We have far too many people who profess piety, but when piety conflicts with their politics, their career, or their business practices, then they pretend that they can wear two faces, be two different people.  They claim, and perhaps even have convinced themselves, that they can privately honor Christ and publicly seek to run him and his values out of the public square on a rail.

Hilary Clinton and Tim Kaine will be the first to tell you that they are privately devout, “but…”


I don’t know about you, but I plan to vote for someone who lets his "faith inform [his] life.”  I think it is the truly Christian thing to do.  Don’t you?

Tom Sheppard is a business consultant and coach to small business owners and individuals. He is a recognized author with dozens of titles in business and fiction to his credit. One of his endeavors is to help those who want to see their own book in print. He does this through his trademarked Book Whispering Process (TM). 

 The author is not an official spokesperson for any organization or person mentioned herein. 

(c) Copyright 2016 A+ Results LLC. All Rights Reserved. 

Your comments are welcome... Please observe some ground rules. No profanity, vulgarity, or personal attacks. Profanity, vulgarity and personal attacks not only betray a lack of vocabulary and imagination, they also are the hallmarks of bigotry, and bigotry is the hallmark of someone who is fundamentally insecure in their views. Facts are always welcome.